ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2020
Prognostic Markers of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- RNA Splicing as a Therapeutic Target in Cancer.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2026Review
- Low Allele Frequency Variants Identified on Germline Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Cancer Predisposition Can Suggest the Presence of Constitutional Mosaicism.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on microRNA and CD marker expression in AML patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Upregulation of S100A6 and its relation with CD34Heliyon · 2023Article
- The Genetic Landscape of Myelodysplastic Neoplasm Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Antibiotic-Resistant Pyrexia of Unknown Origin: An Unusual Presentation of Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Cureus · 2021Article
- Article
- MicroRNAs in the Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Acta naturaeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal disease characterized by multilineage dysplasia, peripheral blood cytopenias, and a high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. In theory, from clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential to hematologic malignancies, there is a complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors, including miRNA. In practice, karyotype analysis assigns patients to different prognostic groups, and mutations are often associated with a particular disease phenotype. Among myeloproliferative disorders, secondary MDS is a group of special entities with a typical spectrum of genetic mutations and cytogenetic rearrangements resembling those in de novo MDS. This overview analyzes the present prognostic systems of MDS and the most recent efforts in the search for genetic and epigenetic markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.