Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726930›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2020

Emerging Technologies for the Extraction of Marine Phenolics: Opportunities and Challenges.

Adane Tilahun Getachew, Charlotte Jacobsen, Susan Løvstad Holdt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adane Tilahun GetachewNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 204, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Charlotte JacobsenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 204, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3540-9669
Susan Løvstad HoldtNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 204, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-782X

Funding

The European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant . 713683 (COFUNDfellowsDTU)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural phenolic compounds are important classes of plant, microorganism, and algal secondary metabolites. They have well-documented beneficial biological activities. The marine environment is less explored than other environments but have huge potential for the discovery of new unique compounds with potential applications in, e.g., food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries. To survive in a very harsh and challenging environment, marine organisms like several seaweed (macroalgae) species produce and accumulate several secondary metabolites, including marine phenolics in the cells. Traditionally, these compounds were extracted from their sample matrix using organic solvents. This conventional extraction method had several drawbacks such as a long extraction time, low extraction yield, co-extraction of other compounds, and usage of a huge volume of one or more organic solvents, which consequently results in environmental pollution. To mitigate these drawbacks, newly emerging technologies, such as enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) have received huge interest from researchers around the world. Therefore, in this review, the most recent and emerging technologies are discussed for the extraction of marine phenolic compounds of interest for their antioxidant and other bioactivity in, e.g., cosmetic and food industry. Moreover, the opportunities and the bottleneck for upscaling of these technologies are also presented.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsChemical FractionationChromatography, Supercritical FluidDiffusion of InnovationEnzymesMicrowavesPhenolsSecondary MetabolismSolventsUltrasonic WavesEnzymesPhenolsSolventsemerging technologiesextractionmarine phenolics

Identifiers

PMID32726930
PMCPMC7459876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.