Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726927›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Hazard Curves for Tumor Recurrence and Tumor-Related Death Following Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Joerg Lindenmann, Melanie Fediuk, Nicole Fink-Neuboeck, Christian Porubsky, Martin Pichler, Luka Brcic, Udo Anegg, Marija Balic, Nadia Dandachi, Alfred Maier and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joerg LindenmannDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1276-7666
Melanie FediukDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Nicole Fink-NeuboeckDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Christian PorubskyDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Martin PichlerDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8701-9462
Luka BrcicDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9098-8416
Udo AneggDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Marija BalicDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9482-9191
Nadia DandachiDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9093-0743
Alfred MaierDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Maria SmolleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-0899
Josef SmolleInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8005-4660
Freyja Maria Smolle-JuettnerDivision of Thoracic and Hyperbaric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · ATThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe knowledge of both patterns and risk of relapse following resection for esophageal cancer is crucial for establishing appropriate surveillance schedules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of hazards for tumor recurrence and tumor-related death in the postoperative long-term follow-up after esophagectomy.

methodsRetrospective single-center analysis of 362 patients, with resected esophageal cancer. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used.

resultsA total of 192 (53%) had postoperative tumor recurrence. The relapse patterns of adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma showed that each had a single peak, 12 months after surgery. After induction there was one peak at 5 months, the non-induced patients peaked 11 months, postoperatively. At 18 months, the recurrence hazard declined sharply in all cases. The hazard curves for tumor-related death were bimodal for adenocarcinoma, with two peaks at 6 and 22 months and one single peak for squamous-cell carcinoma at 18 months after surgery, showing pronounced decline later on.

conclusionIn curatively resected esophageal cancer, both tumor recurrence hazard and hazard for tumor-related death showed distinct, partly bimodal patterns. It could be justified to intensify the surveillance during the first two postoperative years by initiating a close-meshed follow-up to detect and treat tumor recurrence, as early as possible.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagectomyhazardsurveillancesurvivaltumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID32726927
PMCPMC7466063
OpenAlexW3043856073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.