ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2021
Perception of Dentofacial Aesthetics in School Children and Their Parents.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of free preventive dental programme for children: 10 years of Lov'U'r Teeth, France.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2024Article
- Psychosocial Impact of Malocclusion and Self-Perceived Orthodontic Treatment Need among Young Adult Dental Patients.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- The Effect of Third Molars on the Mandibular Anterior Crowding Relapse-A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2023Review
- Surface Roughness and Translucency of Various Translucent Zirconia Ceramics after Hydrothermal Aging.European journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Influence of the Inclination of the Incisal Edge of Planas Direct Tracks on Deciduous Dentition with Anterior Crossbite: Finite-Elements Study.European journal of dentistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this research was to examine the attitudes and perceptions of dentofacial aesthetics among different age groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe sample consisted of elementary-school students from the city of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and their parents. This study included 314 subjects: 157 children and 157 parents. The children's group consisted of 85 (54.14%) males and 72 (45.85%) females, aged 9 to 15 years. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were used to determine frequency distribution and percentages for all variables. A chi-squared (
resultsFor the dentofacial appearance with no teeth irregularity or with severe teeth irregularity, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) (post-hoc tests-Tukey's HSD) indicated that the difference is not statistically significant (
conclusionAttitudes about desirable and acceptable dental aesthetics differ in younger children compared with older children and parents. Ten years old children find good function with poor aesthetics more pleasing, while 14 years old children find aesthetics with bad function as more pleasing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.