ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020
Temporal embedding and spatiotemporal feature selection boost multi-voxel pattern analysis decoding accuracy.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age Effects on Neural Discriminability and Monitoring Process During Memory Retrieval for Auditory Words.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn fMRI decoding, temporal embedding of spatial features of the brain allows the incorporation of brain activity dynamics into the multivariate pattern classification process, and provides enriched information about stimulus-specific response patterns and potentially improved prediction accuracy. NEW
methodThis study investigates the possibility of enhancing the classification performance by exploring temporal embedding, to identify the optimum combination of spatiotemporal features based on their classification performance. We investigated the importance of spatiotemporal feature selection using a slow event-related design adapted from the classic Haxby study (Haxby et al., 2001). Data were collected using a multiband fMRI sequence with temporal resolution of 0.568 s. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsA wide range of spatiotemporal observations were created as various combinations of spatiotemporal features. Using both random forest, and support vector machine, classifiers prediction accuracies for these combinations were then compared with the single spatial multivariate pattern approach that uses only a single temporal observation.
resultsOur findings showed that, on average, spatiotemporal feature selection improved prediction accuracy. Moreover, the random forest algorithm outperformed the support vector machine and benefitted from temporal information to a greater extent.
conclusionsAs expected, the most influential temporal durations were found to be around the peak of the hemodynamic response function, a few seconds after the stimuli onset until -4 s after the peak of the hemodynamic response function. The superiority of spatiotemporal feature selection over single time-point spatial approaches invites future work to design optimal approaches that incorporate spatiotemporal dependencies into feature selection for decoding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.