Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726413›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2020

Breed Differences in Dog Cognition Associated with Brain-Expressed Genes and Neurological Functions.

Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Brian Hare, Noah Snyder-Mackler, Josep Call, Juliane Kaminski, Ádám Miklósi, Evan L MacLean

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic testing predicts appearance but not behavior in dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Shepherd and the Hunter: A Genomic Comparison of Italian Dog Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gitanjali E GnanadesikanSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Brian HareDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Noah Snyder-MacklerDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Josep CallSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Juliane KaminskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Ádám MiklósiDepartment of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Evan L MacLeanSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USArizona State University · USDuke University · USInstitute for Soil Sciences · HUUniversity of Portsmouth · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Longitudinal Cognitive and Emotional Development in Working DogsR01HD097732 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRUEN, MARGARET ELIZABETH, HARE, BRIAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD097732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given their remarkable phenotypic diversity, dogs present a unique opportunity for investigating the genetic bases of cognitive and behavioral traits. Our previous work demonstrated that genetic relatedness among breeds accounts for a substantial portion of variation in dog cognition. Here, we investigated the genetic architecture of breed differences in cognition, seeking to identify genes that contribute to variation in cognitive phenotypes. To do so, we combined cognitive data from the citizen science project Dognition.com with published breed-average genetic polymorphism data, resulting in a dataset of 1654 individuals with cognitive phenotypes representing 49 breeds. We conducted a breed-average genome-wide association study to identify specific polymorphisms associated with breed differences in inhibitory control, communication, memory, and physical reasoning. We found five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that reached genome-wide significance after Bonferroni correction, located in EML1, OR52E2, HS3ST5, a U6 spliceosomal RNA, and a long noncoding RNA. When we combined results across multiple SNPs within the same gene, we identified 188 genes implicated in breed differences in cognition. This gene set included more genes than expected by chance that were (1) differentially expressed in brain tissue and (2) involved in nervous system functions including peripheral nervous system development, Wnt signaling, presynapse assembly, and synaptic vesicle exocytosis. These results advance our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of complex cognitive phenotypes and identify specific genetic variants for further research.

Indexed as

CognitionGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBrainDogsGenomePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID32726413
PMCPMC7608742
OpenAlexW3045733426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.