ArticlePloS one2020
Muscle strength, muscle power and body composition in college-aged young women and men with Generalized Joint Hypermobility.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generalized joint hypermobility and neck pain: Prevalence and functional correlates from a community-based sample.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2026Article
- Ankle muscle strength, joint hypermobility, and foot posture in children aged 5-10 years: A cross-sectional study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Statistical evaluation of body composition and aerobic/anaerobic power in young adults with generalized joint hypermobility: an ANCOVA-based study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Age- and sex-related changes in children with and without generalized joint hypermobility: a two-year follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Present but Ignored: Physical Condition and Health-Related Quality of Life in College-Aged Females with Generalized Joint Hypermobility.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The strength of balance: Strength and dynamic balance in children with and without hypermobility.PloS one · 2024Article
- Lower rates of return to sport in patients with generalised joint hypermobility two years after ACL reconstruction: a prospective cohort study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Normative Values for Pinch Strength-Relationship With Joint Hypermobility as Measured With the Beighton Criteria.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was an evaluation of the musculoskeletal system in women and men with Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH). The study included 87 participants- 40 with Generalized Joint Hypermobility (aged 21.2 ±1.8 years) and 47 (aged 21.0 ±1.3 years) in the control group (CG). The study included the Beighton score, the measurements of body composition, muscle flexibility (Straight Leg Raise test, Popliteal Angle test, Modified Thomas Test), and the measurements of muscle strength and muscle power. T-test and Mann-Whitney U Test were applied to assess the differences between independent groups. The study showed that there were no significant differences (p>.05) in the assessed body composition and the muscle flexibility between both women and men with GJH and the participants in the CG. Under isokinetic conditions for the non-dominant lower extremity, men from the CG received significantly higher (p = .02) flexion peak torque at 180°/s angular velocity. Women from the CG received a statistically significantly lower (p = .04) F/E ratio at 180°/s velocity. Under isometric conditions for both women and men with GJH, there were no statistically significant differences (p>.05) in the maximum torques in knee extension and flexion compared to the CG. For women and men with GJH, the maximum power in the lower extremities and jumping ability were not significantly different (p>.05) compared to the CG participants. The body composition, muscle flexibility, muscle strength, and muscle power of adults with Generalized Joint Hypermobility did not differ compared to healthy participants. The fact that there are no differences does not exclude the efficacy of strength training in increasing levels of muscle strength and its impact on body posture and proprioception or coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.