Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726336›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Worldwide research on fear of childbirth: A bibliometric analysis.

Lijing Dai, Na Zhang, Liu Rong, Yan-Qiong Ouyang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lijing DaiSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Na ZhangSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Liu RongSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yan-Qiong OuyangSchool of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-5944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the research on fear of childbirth, analyze and evaluate the publications by means of bibliometric analysis, and provide suggestions and scopes for future study. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. STUDY SELECTION: All published articles focusing on the fear of childbirth from inception to February 10, 2020. DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 743 articles were included for final analysis. Bibliographic data were exported from databases and then cleaned manually before using Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer to analyze and visualize the findings. DATA SYNTHESIS: It was found that 743 articles have been cited 31515 times (h-index: 98). The volume of publications increased by 29.3 times in the past two decades. Across the globe, Sweden was the most prolific country having 129 articles (17.4%) with six of its institutions in the top ten most prolific institutions in the world. Fifty-two (7.8%) documents were published in Midwifery journal. The most prolific author was Hildingsson, who published 35 articles (4.7%). "Cesarean section," "experience," and "factor" were the words that appeared most frequently in titles and abstracts of studies. "Point prevalence of psychiatric disorders during the second trimester of pregnancy: A population-based study" was the most cited article and received 525 citations.

conclusionThere is an increasing interest in the research in fear of childbirth during the past two decades. This study has demonstrated that the Swedish authors have a leading role on this topic. Researchers especially in countries with high birth rates, need to promote research projects in this field as it is an important public health issue.

Indexed as

BibliometricsFearResearchDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyPublications

Identifiers

PMID32726336
PMCPMC7390386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.