Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726314›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The effect of a severe psychiatric illness on colorectal cancer treatment and survival: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Alyson L Mahar, Paul Kurdyak, Timothy P Hanna, Natalie G Coburn, Patti A Groome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Secondary Stroke Prevention in People With Schizophrenia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alyson L MaharDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Manitoba Centre for Health Policy University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-3760
Paul KurdyakICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy P HannaICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie G CoburnICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patti A GroomeICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP-119370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify inequalities in cancer survival rates for patients with a history of severe psychiatric illness (SPI) compared to those with no history of mental illness and explore differences in the provision of recommended cancer treatment as a potential explanation.

designPopulation-based retrospective cohort study using linked cancer registry and administrative data at ICES.

settingThe universal healthcare system in Ontario, Canada.

participantsColorectal cancer (CRC) patients diagnosed between April 1st, 2007 and December 31st, 2012. SPI history (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorders, other psychotic disorders, bipolar disorders or major depressive disorders) was determined using hospitalization, emergency department, and psychiatrist visit data and categorized as 'no history of mental illness, 'outpatient SPI history', and 'inpatient SPI history'.

main outcome measuresCancer-specific survival, non-receipt of surgical resection, and non-receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation.

results24,507 CRC patients were included; 482 (2.0%) had an outpatient SPI history and 258 (1.0%) had an inpatient SPI history. Individuals with an SPI history had significantly lower survival rates and were significantly less likely to receive guideline recommended treatment than CRC patients with no history of mental illness. The adjusted HR for cancer-specific death was 1.69 times higher for individuals with an inpatient SPI (95% CI 1.36-2.09) and 1.24 times higher for individuals with an outpatient SPI history (95% CI 1.04-1.48). Stage II and III CRC patients with an inpatient SPI history were 2.15 times less likely (95% CI 1.07-4.33) to receive potentially curative surgical resection and 2.07 times less likely (95% CI 1.72-2.50) to receive adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. These findings were consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsIndividuals with an SPI history experience inequalities in colorectal cancer care and survival within a universal healthcare system. Increasing advocacy and the availability of resources to support individuals with an SPI within the cancer system are warranted to reduce the potential for unnecessary harm.

Indexed as

AdultBipolar DisorderCancer SurvivorsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32726314
PMCPMC7390537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.