Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726293›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2020

[18F]FDG PET immunotherapy radiomics signature (iRADIOMICS) predicts response of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab.

Damijan Valentinuzzi, Martina Vrankar, Nina Boc, Valentina Ahac, Ziga Zupancic, Mojca Unk, Katja Skalic, Ivana Zagar, Andrej Studen, Urban Simoncic and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic value ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Theranostics.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. BaselineFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Advancements in Radiomics for Immunotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. PET Imaging in Bladder Cancer: An Update and Future Direction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Damijan ValentinuzziJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Martina VrankarInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nina BocInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Valentina AhacInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ziga ZupancicInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mojca UnkInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katja SkalicInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivana ZagarInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrej StudenJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urban SimoncicJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jens EickhoffDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Robert JerajJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the paradigm of cancer treatment; however, non-invasive biomarkers of response are still needed to identify candidates for non-responders. We aimed to investigate whether immunotherapy [18F]FDG PET radiomics signature (iRADIOMICS) predicts response of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to pembrolizumab better than the current clinical standards. Patients and methods Thirty patients receiving pembrolizumab were scanned with [18F]FDG PET/CT at baseline, month 1 and 4. Associations of six robust primary tumour radiomics features with overall survival were analysed with Mann-Whitney U-test (MWU), Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and ROC curve analysis. iRADIOMICS was constructed using univariate and multivariate logistic models of the most promising feature(s). Its predictive power was compared to PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) and iRECIST using ROC curve analysis. Prediction accuracies were assessed with 5-fold cross validation. Results The most predictive were baseline radiomics features, e.g. Small Run Emphasis (MWU, p = 0.001; hazard ratio = 0.46, p = 0.007; AUC = 0.85 (95% CI 0.69-1.00)). Multivariate iRADIOMICS was found superior to the current standards in terms of predictive power and timewise with the following AUC (95% CI) and accuracy (standard deviation): iRADIOMICS (baseline), 0.90 (0.78-1.00), 78% (18%); PD-L1 TPS (baseline), 0.60 (0.37-0.83), 53% (18%); iRECIST (month 1), 0.79 (0.62-0.95), 76% (16%); iRECIST (month 4), 0.86 (0.72-1.00), 76% (17%). Conclusions Multivariate iRADIOMICS was identified as a promising imaging biomarker, which could improve management of metastatic NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab. The predicted non-responders could be offered other treatment options to improve their overall survival.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiopharmaceuticalsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18Immune Checkpoint InhibitorspembrolizumabRadiopharmaceuticals[18F]FDG PET/CTanti-PD-1iRADIOMICSnon-small-cell lung cancerradiomics analysis

Identifiers

PMID32726293
PMCPMC7409607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.