Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726230›Full record

SynthesisThe western journal of emergency medicine2020

Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Arif Musa, Kasim Pendi, Areio Hashemi, Elizabeth Warbasse, Sarkis Kouyoumjian, Jenna Yousif, Emily Blodget, Susan Stevens, Besma Aly, David A Baron

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scoping insight on antiviral drugs against COVID-19.Arabian journal of chemistry · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arif MusaWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Kasim PendiSouthern California University of Health Sciences, School of Professional Studies, Whittier, California.
Areio HashemiWilliam Carey University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi.
Elizabeth WarbasseWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Sarkis KouyoumjianWayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Jenna YousifWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Emily BlodgetUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Susan StevensWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Besma AlyWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
David A BaronWestern University of Health Sciences, Office of the Provost, Pomona, California.
Wayne State University · USSouthern California University of Health Sciences · USUniversity of Southern California · USWestern University of Health Sciences · USWilliam Carey University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the spread of SARS-CoV-2 a global pandemic. To date, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has spread to over 200 countries, leading to over 1.6 million cases and over 99,000 deaths. Given that there is neither a vaccine nor proven treatment for COVID-19, there is currently an urgent need for effective pharmacotherapy. To address the need for an effective treatment of SARS-CoV-2 during the worldwide pandemic, this systematic review of intravenous (IV) remdesivir was performed. Remdesivir, an anti-viral prodrug originally developed to treat Ebola virus disease, has shown broad spectrum activity against the Coronavirus family. A recent case report reported improvement of clinical symptoms with remdesivir in a patient with COVID-19. After conducting a systematic search of 18 clinical trial registries and three large scientific databases, we identified 86 potentially eligible items. Following removal of duplicates (n = 21), eligible studies were reviewed independently by two authors. After the first round of screening, inter-rater agreement was 98.5% (κ = 0.925). After the second round of full-text screening, inter-rater agreement was 100%. A total of seven ongoing and recruiting clinical trials of remdesivir (100-200 milligrams, intravenous [IV]) were included. We identified the following primary outcomes: patients discharged (n = 2); time to clinical status improvement (n = 2); improved O2 saturation (n = 2); body temperature normalization (n = 2); and clinical status (n = 1). Secondary outcomes in all identified studies included documentation of adverse events. Phase 3 trials are expected to be completed between April 2020-2023. Therefore, despite supportive data from in vitro and in vivo studies, the clinical effectiveness of IV remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19 and potential side effects remain incompletely defined in the human population.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAdministration, IntravenousAlanineAntiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral Agentsremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID32726230
PMCPMC7390571
OpenAlexW3026803444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.