Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726183›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2020

XMAP215 and γ-tubulin additively promote microtubule nucleation in purified solutions.

Brianna R King, Michelle Moritz, Haein Kim, David A Agard, Charles L Asbury, Trisha N Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms underlying spindle assembly and robustness.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. How Microtubules Build the Spindle Branch by Branch.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. γ-Tubulin in microtubule nucleation and beyond.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brianna R KingDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Michelle MoritzDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Haein KimDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
David A AgardDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158.
Charles L AsburyDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Trisha N DavisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
University of Washington · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
The Yeast Centrosome - Structure Assembly & FunctionP01GM105537 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WINEY, MARK · 2014 to 2018
$8.3M
Microtubule Nucleation: Structure & MechanismR01GM031627 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AGARD, DAVID A. · 1985 to 2016
$6.1M
Reconstitution and biophysical study of chromosome segregation machineryR35GM134842 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Charles L Asbury · 2020 to 2026
$4.7M
Supplement to Biophysical Study of Reconstituted Kinetochore-microtubule AttachmentsR01GM079373 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ASBURY, CHARLES · 2006 to 2019
$4.5M
Structure & Mechanism: microtubule nucleation, centrosomes, phage cytoskeletonR35GM118099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AGARD, DAVID A. · 2016 to 2022
$3.6M
Molecular Analysis of Chromosome SegregationR35GM130293 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRISHA N. · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM105537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031627NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079373NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118099NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130293NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134842NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubule nucleation is spatiotemporally regulated in cells by several known molecules, including the template γ-tubulin and the polymerase XMAP215. The role of XMAP215 in nucleation is under debate, specifically whether it acts independently as a polymerase or acts dependently with γ-tubulin. We first confirm XMAP215 as a classically defined nucleator that reduces the nucleation lag seen in bulk tubulin assembly. Secondly, using deletion constructs, we probe the domain requirements for XMAP215 to promote microtubule nucleation. We show that its ability to nucleate microtubules in purified solutions correlates with its ability to elongate existing microtubules and does not depend on the number of tumor overexpressed gene (TOG) domains. Finally, we show that XMAP215 and γ-tubulin promote αβ-tubulin assembly in an additive, not synergistic, manner. Thus, their modes of action during microtubule nucleation are distinct. These findings suggest there are at least two independent processes in nucleation, one promoted by γ-tubulin and one promoted by XMAP215. We propose that XMAP215 accelerates the addition of subunits to existing nucleation intermediates formed either spontaneously or by oligomers of γ-tubulin. [Media: see text].

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesProtein AggregatesProtein BindingTubulinMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsProtein AggregatesTubulin

Identifiers

PMID32726183
PMCPMC7550701
OpenAlexW3045867367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.