Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32726177›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2021

Investigating the implementation of differentiated HIV services and implications for pregnant and postpartum women: A mixed methods multi-country study.

Rujeko S Chimukuche, Alison Wringe, John Songo, Farida Hassan, Lameck Luwanda, Thoko Kalua, Mosa Moshabela, Jenny Renju, Janet Seeley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. International journal of MCH and AIDS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rujeko S ChimukucheAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Alison WringeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-3461
John SongoMalawi Epidemiology & Intervention Research Unit, Karonga, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0002-0126-7976
Farida HassanIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Lameck LuwandaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Thoko KaluaDepartment of HIV and AIDS, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Mosa MoshabelaAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-7095
Jenny RenjuLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Janet SeeleyAfrica Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-5272
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAfrica Health Research Institute · ZAIfakara Health Institute · TZMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit · MWMinistry of Health · MW

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014313/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for pregnant and postpartum women in sub-Saharan Africa has required adaptations to service delivery. We compared national policies on differentiated HIV service delivery with facility-level implementation, and explored provider and user experiences in rural Malawi, Tanzania and South Africa. Four national policies and two World Health Organization guidelines on HIV treatment for pregnant and postpartum women published between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed and summarised. Results were compared with implementation data from surveys undertaken in 34 health facilities. Eighty-seven in-depth interviews were conducted with pregnant and post-partum women living with HIV, their partners and providers. In 2018, differentiated service policies varied across countries. None specifically accounted for pregnant or postpartum women. Malawian policies endorsed facility-based multi-month scripting for clinically-stable adult ART patients, excluding pregnant or breastfeeding women. In Tanzania and South Africa, national policies proposed community-based and facility-based approaches, for which pregnant women were not eligible. Interview data suggested some implementation of differentiated services for pregnant and postpartum women beyond stipulated policies in all settings. Although these adaptations were appreciated by pregnant and postpartum women, they could lead to frustrations among other users when criteria for fast-track services or multi-month prescriptions were not clear.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsAdultBreast FeedingFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMalawiPostpartum PeriodPregnancyART deliverydifferentiated service deliveryHIVHIV policy implementationsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32726177
PMCPMC7612752
OpenAlexW3045992069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.