ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2020
Inhaled aerosolized nicotine suppresses the lung eosinophilic response to house dust mite allergen.
Article in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of e-cigarette use on asthma severity in adult BALB/c mice.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- E-cigarette vapor extract alters human eosinophil gene expression in an effect mediated by propylene glycol, glycerin, and nicotine.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2024Article
- Age-Associated Tooth Loss and Oral Microbial Dysbiosis in a Mouse Genetic Model of Chronic Nicotine Exposure.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nicotine of unprecedented concentrations and purity is being inhaled by those using commercially available electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The consequences of this route of self-administration on the immunological response to inhaled allergens are not known. In mice, sensitization and inhalation challenge with the common environmental house dust mite (HDM) allergen is an experimental model of this response. When mice were exposed to aerosolized nicotine base (aeroNic) twice daily, 5 days/wk for 8 wk, the HDM-induced recruitment of eosinophils (EOS) was substantially reduced as measured in bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Oral nicotine administration had no effect. HDM challenge in the presence of nicotinic receptor subtype α7 (α7)-specific type-1 positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) was alone sufficient to suppress EOS. RNA analysis of alveolar macrophages (AM) collected from BALF after HDM challenge of aeroNic revealed that α7 activation strongly suppresses initiation of Ccl24 (eotaxin 2) transcription. To examine possible cellular signaling mechanisms coupling α7 to Ccl24 transcription, an AM culture model system was used. In AM cultures of freshly collected BALF, Ccl24 transcription was robustly activated by a mixture of IL-4 and IL-10, and this was suppressed by coapplication of type-1 PAMs through a pathway that requires p38MAPK but is independent of Jak2. These results suggest that the EOS response to HDM inhaled allergen is subject to modulation through activation of the α7 receptor and suggest that the allergic response may be substantially modified in ENDS users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.