Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725781›Full record

ReviewMolecular informatics2020

Cheminformatics in Natural Product-based Drug Discovery.

Ya Chen, Johannes Kirchmair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. GABAPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ya ChenCenter for Bioinformatics (ZBH), Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences, Universität Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes KirchmairCenter for Bioinformatics (ZBH), Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences, Universität Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-5877

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201606010345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review seeks to provide a timely survey of the scope and limitations of cheminformatics methods in natural product-based drug discovery. Following an overview of data resources of chemical, biological and structural information on natural products, we discuss, among other aspects, in silico methods for (i) data curation and natural products dereplication, (ii) analysis, visualization, navigation and comparison of the chemical space, (iii) quantification of natural product-likeness, (iv) prediction of the bioactivities (virtual screening, target prediction), ADME and safety profiles (toxicity) of natural products, (v) natural products-inspired de novo design and (vi) prediction of natural products prone to cause interference with biological assays. Among the many methods discussed are rule-based, similarity-based, shape-based, pharmacophore-based and network-based approaches, docking and machine learning methods.

Indexed as

CheminformaticsDrug DiscoveryBiological AssayBiological ProductsComputer SimulationHumansMacromolecular SubstancesBiological ProductsMacromolecular Substancescheminformaticsdatabasesdrug discoveryin silico methodsnatural products

Identifiers

PMID32725781
PMCPMC7757247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.