Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725567›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Quantitative source identification and apportionment of heavy metals under two different land use types: comparison of two receptor models APCS-MLR and PMF.

Min Zhang, Xueping Wang, Chang Liu, Jiayu Lu, Yuhong Qin, Yunkan Mo, Pengjun Xiao, Ying Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min ZhangCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xueping WangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Disaster in the Beibu Gulf, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou, 535011, China.
Chang LiuCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jiayu LuCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yuhong QinCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yunkan MoCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Pengjun XiaoCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Ying LiuCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081, China. liuying4300@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-2524
Minzu University of China · CNBeibu Gulf University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University (CN) 2019, Master, SSZZKY-2019106National Natural Science Foundation of China 21177163Special Guidance Fund of Building World First-class Universities (Disciplines) and Characteristic Development 2019, 10301-0190040129Undergraduate Scientific Research and Training Program of Minzu University of China BEIJ2018110005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, many researchers are increasingly aware of the importance of using models to identify heavy metal (HM) pollution sources. However, on the performance and application of different source identification models to HMs under different land use types had been studied little. In this study, comparison of absolute principal component scores-multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR) and positive matrix factorization (PMF) models and their application characteristics in identifying pollution sources were carried out by using 11 HMs in Zhongwei City farmland and Shizuishan industrial park, Ningxia. The results indicated that HM pollution in farmland mainly came from pesticides, fertilizers, and deposition of the Yellow River, while the pollution in industrial park mainly originated from atmospheric deposition and various industrial productions. The APCS-MLR model had the problem of less identification sources and the difficulty to explain the complex pollution, while the PMF model not only identified more pollution sources, but also distinguished heavy metal-related sources for two different land use types and different industrial production conditions. It is of great significance the formulation of agricultural-related pesticides' and chemical fertilizers' rational use and various industrial production-related raw materials put in and emission control strategies.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringMetals, HeavyChinaCitiesLinear ModelsRiversMetals, HeavyComparison study of APCS-MLR and PMFNingxiaSource apportionment of HMsTwo different land use types

Identifiers

PMID32725567
OpenAlexW3045804959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.