ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Revealing empirical association among ecological footprints, renewable energy consumption, real income, and financial development: a global perspective.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of renewable energy based power supply options for telecom towers.Environment, development and sustainability · 2023Review
- Does financial development reinforce ecological footprint in Singapore? Evidence from ARDL and Bayesian analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Ecological footprint, public-private partnership investment in energy, and financial development in Brazil: a gradual shift causality approach.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Renewable energy, economic development, and ecological footprint nexus: fresh evidence of renewable energy environment Kuznets curve (RKC) from income groups.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study quantifies the effect of real income, financial development, trade openness, and renewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint (EFP) of consumption for a panel data of 152 economies during the period 1990-2017. Several panel unit root tests validate that datasets are stationary. The findings from the Westerlund co-integration test depict that variables are co-integrated. The augmented mean group panel algorithm method is then applied to measure the long-run linkage between variables. The analysis outcomes show a negative and significant association between the EFP and real income per capita in the case of the higher-income group while remaining groups depict the other way round relationship. Further, openness and renewable energy consumption are also observed to reduce EFP in the groups of higher-income and upper-middle-income economies. Finally, financial development is observed to lessen environmental degradation in the case of the higher-income group. Similarly, the results of the Granger causality test based on the Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel provided evidence of varied causality relationship among the variables in different income groups. In addition, we also surpassed an impulse response and variance decomposition analysis that permitted to forecast the impact of concerned variables on environmental degradation during the selected period. Finally, the findings from the empirical analysis suggest that per capita economic growth will have an increasing effect on the EFP for the concerned income group except for higher-income countries in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32725562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.