Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725490›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020

[Psychosocial therapy in psychiatry : Update of the DGPPN-S3 guidelines "Psychosocial therapies for severe mental illnesses"].

U Gühne, S Weinmann, Th Becker, S G Riedel-Heller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

U GühneInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Arbeitsmedizin und Public Health (ISAP), Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 55, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. Uta.Guehne@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
S WeinmannKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Deutschland.
Th BeckerKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie II der Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Günzburg, Deutschland.
S G Riedel-HellerInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Arbeitsmedizin und Public Health (ISAP), Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 55, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Leipzig University · DEUniversität Ulm · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere mental illnesses are often associated with substantial impairments of psychosocial functioning and a high risk of social exclusion. Along with somatic and psychotherapeutic treatment approaches, psychosocial interventions are an integral component of treatment. Psychosocial therapies aim to improve participation and enable patients to live self-determined lives as far as possible.

objectiveThis paper provides an overview of the structure and recommendations of the German S3 guidelines "Psychosocial therapies for severe mental illnesses" of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN). MATERIAL AND

methodsIn the DGPPN S3 guidelines psychosocial therapies are systematically described for the first time and recommendations are formulated on the basis of a systematic processing of scientific evidence and a formalized consensus process.

resultsThe evidence-based and consensus-based guidelines formulate a total of 33 recommendations and 12 statements. For many psychosocial interventions there is a broad evidence base. In the field of individual interventions psychoeducation, social skills training and health-promoting interventions have been given the highest recommendation strength (A). In the field of system level interventions, team-based, multiprofessional community psychiatric approaches, supported employment and self-determined housing with mobile support (supported housing) are given A level recommendations. For other interventions, the current evidence base is less robust.

conclusionThe successful implementation of guidelines depends not only on the quality but also on the dissemination. Therefore, in addition to the treatment guidelines a short version, a patient version and a waiting room version were developed.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychiatryHumansPsychotherapyCommunity mental health careEffectivenessParticipationRecoverySelf-help

Identifiers

PMID32725490
OpenAlexW3046159678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.