Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725487›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2020

Twenty-Year Follow-Up of Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Giovanni Cennamo, Feliciana Menna, Fabrizio Sinisi, Gilda Cennamo, Maria Angelica Breve, Pasquale Napolitano, Maddalena De Bernardo, Livio Vitiello, Nicola Rosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Long-term outcomes of PRK, LASIK and SMILE].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni CennamoHead and Neck Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Feliciana MennaHead and Neck Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio SinisiHead and Neck Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Gilda CennamoHead and Neck Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Maria Angelica BreveHead and Neck Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Pasquale NapolitanoHead and Neck Department, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Maddalena De BernardoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy.
Livio VitielloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy.
Nicola RosaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy. nrosa@unisa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2366-6556
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhotorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was introduced in the late 1980s to correct myopia. The purpose of this study was to assess its long-term efficacy and safety, analyzing patients with at least 20-year follow-up.

methodsThis retrospective observational study was carried out on 85 eyes of 54 patients (33 females) that underwent PRK between 1991 and 1998 (mean age 32.62 ± 9.74, range 18-55 years). Both preoperatively and postoperatively, patients underwent a complete ophthalmological evaluation, including uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, slit-lamp, intraocular pressure, dilated fundus, and corneal topographic examinations. The outcome assessment was made by comparing the preoperative refraction, as spherical equivalent, with the postoperative ones, taking into account the planned refractive correction. Safety and efficacy indices were also calculated. All the data were evaluated with a paired t test.

resultsThe mean attempted correction as spherical equivalent was - 5.64 ± 3.01 D (range - 1.00 to - 15.00 D), while the mean achieved correction after 20 years was - 4.30 ± 3.13 D (range - 1.88 to - 14.25 D), with a significant statistical difference (p < 0.01). The mean expected refractive outcome was - 0.27 ± 0.81 D (range - 4.00 to + 1.25 D). The mean difference between achieved and attempted treatment was 1.33 ± 1.92 D (range - 4.25 to + 6.25 D), with a significant difference (p < 0.01). The safety index was 1.00 and the efficacy index was 0.63.

conclusionThe results provided by this study highlight that the procedure could be considered safe, with no long-term sight-threatening complications such as late ectasia or haze.

Indexed as

Long-term follow-upMyopiaPhotorefractive keratectomyPRK

Identifiers

PMID32725487
PMCPMC7708547
OpenAlexW3045896682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.