ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2020
Twenty-Year Follow-Up of Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retreatment using LASIK, PRK, or ICL for myopic regression after corneal laser refractive surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Machine learning quantitative OCT derived fibrosis indicators for corneal haze evaluation.PloS one · 2026Article
- 8-to-10-Year Follow-Up Results of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Risk Factors for Myopia Regression (Including Near Work Activity) in Southeast Iran.Beyoglu eye journal · 2025Article
- Article
- A No-History Multi-Formula Approach to Improve the IOL Power Calculation after Laser Refractive Surgery: Preliminary Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of Vision Correction and Corneal Thickness at 180-Day Follow-Up After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In-Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Study from a Single Center in Poland of 120 Patients with Myopia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- A 3-month comparison study of subjective and objective visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients with low and moderate myopia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- A formula to improve the reliability of optical axial length measurement in IOL power calculation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- [Long-term outcomes of PRK, LASIK and SMILE].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022Review
- Unexpected ocular morphological changes after corneal refractive surgery: A review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Comparison between two devices in the detection of corneal thickness changes after cataract surgery.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Long-Term Visual and Refractive Stability and Ocular Biometric Changes after Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis for Correction of Myopia: An 8-Year Follow-Up.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhotorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was introduced in the late 1980s to correct myopia. The purpose of this study was to assess its long-term efficacy and safety, analyzing patients with at least 20-year follow-up.
methodsThis retrospective observational study was carried out on 85 eyes of 54 patients (33 females) that underwent PRK between 1991 and 1998 (mean age 32.62 ± 9.74, range 18-55 years). Both preoperatively and postoperatively, patients underwent a complete ophthalmological evaluation, including uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, slit-lamp, intraocular pressure, dilated fundus, and corneal topographic examinations. The outcome assessment was made by comparing the preoperative refraction, as spherical equivalent, with the postoperative ones, taking into account the planned refractive correction. Safety and efficacy indices were also calculated. All the data were evaluated with a paired t test.
resultsThe mean attempted correction as spherical equivalent was - 5.64 ± 3.01 D (range - 1.00 to - 15.00 D), while the mean achieved correction after 20 years was - 4.30 ± 3.13 D (range - 1.88 to - 14.25 D), with a significant statistical difference (p < 0.01). The mean expected refractive outcome was - 0.27 ± 0.81 D (range - 4.00 to + 1.25 D). The mean difference between achieved and attempted treatment was 1.33 ± 1.92 D (range - 4.25 to + 6.25 D), with a significant difference (p < 0.01). The safety index was 1.00 and the efficacy index was 0.63.
conclusionThe results provided by this study highlight that the procedure could be considered safe, with no long-term sight-threatening complications such as late ectasia or haze.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.