Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725455›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2021

Functional Genomics of Epileptogenesis in Animal Models and Humans.

Diego A Forero

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diego A ForeroHealth and Sport Sciences Research Group, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina, Bogotá, Colombia. dforero41@areandina.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-3363
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been estimated that epilepsies are among the top five neurological diseases with the highest burden of disease. In recent years, genome-wide expression studies (GWES) have been carried out in experimental models of epilepsy and in samples from human patients. In this study, I carried out meta-analyses and analyses of convergence for available GWES for epileptogenesis in humans and in mouse, rat, zebrafish and fruit fly models. Multiple lines of evidence (such as genome-wide association data and known druggable genes) were integrated to prioritize top candidate genes for epileptogenesis and a functional enrichment analysis was carried out. Several top candidate genes, which are supported by multiple lines of genomic evidence, such as GRIN1, KCNAB1 and STX1B, were identified. Druggable genes of potential interest (such as GABRA2, GRIK1, KCNAB1 and STX4) were also identified. An enrichment of genes regulated by the MEF2 and SOX5 transcription factors and the miR-106b-5p and miR-101-3p miRNAs was found. The current work is the first meta-analysis and convergent analysis of GWES for epileptogenesis in humans and in multiple animal models, integrating results from several genomic studies. Novel candidate genes and pathways for epileptogenesis were identified in this analysis.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsEpilepsyGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansKv1.3 Potassium ChannelMiceMicroRNAsModels, AnimalRatsReceptors, GABA-AZebrafishKv1.3 Potassium ChannelMicroRNAsReceptors, GABA-AEpilepsiesFunctional genomicsGenomicsNeurological diseasesTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32725455
PMCPMC11448571
OpenAlexW3045770885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.