Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725418›Full record

ArticlePituitary2020

The 5-factor modified frailty index predicts health burden following surgery for pituitary adenomas.

Adham M Khalafallah, Pavan P Shah, Sakibul Huq, Adrian E Jimenez, Palak P Patel, Nyall R London, Amir H Hamrahian, Roberto Salvatori, Gary L Gallia, Nicholas R Rowan and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Economic Burden of Management of Pituitary Adenomas: A Propensity-Score-Matched Cost Analysis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adham M KhalafallahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Pavan P ShahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Sakibul HuqDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Adrian E JimenezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Palak P PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Nyall R LondonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Amir H HamrahianDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Roberto SalvatoriDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Gary L GalliaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Nicholas R RowanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Debraj MukherjeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. dmukher1@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-8237
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFrailty is known to influence cost-related surgical outcomes in neurosurgery, but quantifying frailty is often challenging. Therefore, we investigated the predictive value of the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) on total hospital charges, LOS, and 90-day readmission for patients undergoing pituitary surgery.

methodsThe medical records of all patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection of pituitary adenomas at an academic medical center between January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Bivariate statistical analyses were conducted using Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and independent samples t-test. Linear and logistic regression models were used for multivariate analysis.

resultsOur cohort (n = 234) had a mean age of 53.8 years (standard deviation 14.6 years). Sex distributions were equal, and most patients were Caucasian (59%). On multivariate linear regression, with each one-point increase in mFI-5, total LOS increased by 0.64 days in the overall cohort (p < 0.001), 1.08 days in the Cushing disease cohort (p = 0.045), and 0.59 days in non-functioning tumors cohort (p = 0.004). Total charges increased by $3954 in the whole cohort (p < 0.001), $10,652 in the Cushing disease cohort (p = 0.033), and $2902 in the non-functioning tumors cohort (p = 0.007) with each one-point increase in mFI-5. Greater mFI-5 scores were associated with greater odds of 90-day readmission in both overall and Cushing disease cohorts, but these associations did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionA patient's mFI-5 score is significantly associated with increased length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing pituitary surgery. The mFI-5 may hold peri-operative value in patient counseling for pituitary adenoma surgery.

Indexed as

HumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPituitary ACTH HypersecretionPituitary NeoplasmsRisk FactorsChargesComorbiditiesFrailtyLength of staymFI-5Pituitary surgery

Identifiers

PMID32725418
OpenAlexW3046162808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.