ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2020
Benchmarking Methods of Protein Structure Alignment.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking protein sequence and structure search methods for remote homology detection.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Protein Structural Phylogenetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
- A review of visualisations of protein fold networks and their relationship with sequence and function.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Review
- Real-time structure search and structure classification for AlphaFold protein models.Communications biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The function of a protein is primarily determined by its structure and amino acid sequence. Many biological questions of interest rely on being able to accurately determine the group of structures to which domains of a protein belong; this can be done through alignment and comparison of protein structures. Dozens of different methods for Protein Structure Alignment (PSA) have been proposed that use a wide range of techniques. The aim of this study is to determine the ability of PSA methods to identify pairs of protein domains known to share differing levels of structural similarity, and to assess their utility for clustering domains from several different folds into known groups. We present the results of a comprehensive investigation into eighteen PSA methods, to our knowledge the largest piece of independent research on this topic. Overall, SP-AlignNS (non-sequential) was found to be the best method for classification, and among the best performing methods for clustering. Methods (where possible) were split into the algorithm used to find the optimal alignment and the score used to assess similarity. This allowed us to largely separate the algorithm from the score it maximizes and thus, to assess their effectiveness independently of each other. Surprisingly, we found that some hybrids of mismatched scores and algorithms performed better than either of the native methods at classification and, in some cases, clustering as well. It is hoped that this investigation and the accompanying discussion will be useful for researchers selecting or designing methods to align protein structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32725409What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.