Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725402›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2020

The Use of Advance Directives in Specialized Care Units: A Focus Group Study With Healthcare Professionals in Madrid.

Benjamín Herreros, María José Monforte, Julia Molina, María Velasco, Karmele Olaciregui Dague, Emanuele Valenti

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. No Man (or Woman) Is an Island?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamín HerrerosUnidad de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Instituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea, Calle Budapest 1, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain. benjaminherreros@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-7102
María José MonforteServicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Quirónsalud San José, Calle de Cartagena, 111, 28002, Madrid, Spain.
Julia MolinaUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, HUFA, Unidad de Investigación, Calle Budapest 1, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
María VelascoUnidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, HUFA, Unidad de Investigación, Calle Budapest 1, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Karmele Olaciregui DagueEpileptology Department, University Hospital Bonn, Germany, Building 83, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Emanuele ValentiInstituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Population Health Sciences, Bristol, BS2 8BH, UK.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón · ESHospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid · ESUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III ISCIII key PI12/02822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eight focus groups were conducted in four public hospitals in Madrid to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance directives (ADs) in order to improve the understanding of their lack of success among physicians and patients. A purposive sample of sixty healthcare professionals discussed ADs and reasons for their infrequent use. Three main themes were identified: perceptions about their meaning, appraisals of their use in clinical practice, and decision-making about them. Healthcare professionals perceived a lack of clarity about their definition and implementation. There is insufficient awareness of their efficacy in improving the quality of clinical relationships and decision-making, and they are often perceived only as a bureaucratic procedure. Advance directives are not integrated in the clinical practice of Madrid's healthcare specialist services because their application is exceedingly complex, because of insufficient education about them (for both professionals and citizens), and because of lack of procedural clarity. Consequently, healthcare professionals are not aware of how ADs could improve clinical decision-making, of when and for whom their use is appropriate, and of who has responsibility for providing ADs-related information to patients. These circumstances contribute to patients' lack of interest in completing these documents and to physicians' sceptical views about their usefulness.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysiciansAdvance DirectivesDecision MakingFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansAdvanced care planningAdvance directivesLiving willShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID32725402
OpenAlexW3046056569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.