Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725324›Full record

ArticleThe patient2020

Real World Survey of Patient Engagement Status in Clinical Research: The First Input from Japan.

Nanae Tanemura, Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Junko Sato, Hisashi Urushihara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nanae TanemuraDivision of Drug Development and Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Keio University, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1787-9571
Tsuyoshi SasakiDepartment of Child Psychiatry, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, 260-0856, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-6469
Junko SatoDivision of Drug Development and Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Keio University, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan.
Hisashi UrushiharaDivision of Drug Development and Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Keio University, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8512, Japan. urushihara.hisashi@keio.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-9930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe updated international draft guidelines, the "General Considerations for Clinical Studies, ICH E8 (R1)", state that patient engagement ensures that all perspectives are captured in the research process; however, this is not well understood, specifically in Japan.

objectiveThis study examined the current status and perceptions of patient engagement in clinical research from the perspectives of patient groups, pharmaceutical corporations, and researchers in Japan, using anonymous self-administered questionnaires.

methodsThree online surveys were conducted with patient groups (n = 100), pharmaceutical corporations (n = 66), and researchers (n = 300) in May and June 2019. The main variables were the current status and the current perception of patient engagement in clinical research.

resultsThe response rate was 71% for patient groups and 85% for pharmaceutical corporations, and there were 300 valid responses (emergence rate: 4.9%) from researchers. Experiences with clinical research involving patient engagement were reported by 76.5% of the patients, 21.4% of the pharmaceutical corporations, and 51.7% of the researchers. Patient groups reported three major factors that negatively impacted their relationship with pharmaceutical corporations and researchers: (1) 'lack of understanding of the benefits of partnering'; (2) 'lack of transparency or openness'; and (3) 'unclear or ill-defined processes'.

conclusionsPharmaceutical corporations in Japan have less experience with patient engagement in clinical research than other stakeholders. A neutral connecting system among the stakeholders with a constructive co-learning system will allow effective involvement/engagement of patient groups for enhancing the effectiveness of clinical research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchPatient ParticipationDrug IndustryFemaleHumansJapanMalePatient Outcome AssessmentSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.