Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725245›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer.

Rahul A Sheth, Ravi Murthy, David S Hong, Sapna Patel, Michael J Overman, Adi Diab, Patrick Hwu, Alda Tam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Fracking in Tumors: A Key Drug Transport Mechanism.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul A ShethDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ravi MurthyDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
David S HongDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Sapna PatelDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael J OvermanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Adi DiabDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Patrick HwuDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Alda TamDepartment of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Direct intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is a compelling approach to overcoming barriers to systemic immunotherapy efficacy. While the use of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy drugs is increasing rapidly in both the investigational and standard of care domains, the feasibility and safety of these interventions, particularly for deeper lesions that require image-guidance, remain unknown. Objective: To address current knowledge gaps in image-guided techniques for intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and the safety of these interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series study was performed at a single tertiary cancer center over a 2-year period from January 2016 to January 2018. Patients were followed until January 2019. All patients who underwent image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy agents in the standard of care, off-label, or investigational setting during the study period were included. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 1, 2019. Exposures: Image-guided biopsies and intratumoral injections of immunotherapies across several clinical trials as well as standard of care talimogene laherparepvec therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Technical success, defined as the delivery of the prescribed injectate volume in its entirety, for image-guided biopsy and injections and procedure-related adverse events. Results: A total of 85 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [47-71] years; 42 [52%] men) underwent 498 encounters during the study period. These encounters comprised 327 image-guided intratumoral investigational agent injections in 67 patients in clinical trials, including 33 patients with melanoma (50%), 14 patients with sarcoma (21%), 3 patients with ovarian cancer (4.5%), 2 patients with breast cancer (3%), and 2 patients with colon cancer (3%). An additional 18 patients with melanoma underwent 113 image-guided talimogene laherparepvec injections. There were no adverse events reported related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score ≥3), including dyspnea and severe flu-like symptoms developing within 24 hours of the injection and requiring hospitalization, occurred after 3 of 327 investigational agent injections (2%) and 4 of 113 talimogene laherparepvec injections (4%). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this case series study suggest that intratumoral injections of immunotherapies were feasible across a range of histological conditions and target organs. Immediate postdelivery anticipated adverse events occurred in a small number of instances. Performing physicians should have the necessary safeguards in place to respond as needed. Optimal methods for intratumoral drug delivery remain unresolved, and efforts to standardize drug delivery techniques are required.

Indexed as

Injections, IntralesionalNeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiological ProductsChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionDrug Delivery SystemsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansImage-Guided BiopsyImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiological Productstalimogene laherparepvec

Identifiers

PMID32725245
PMCPMC11984515
OpenAlexW3046123570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.