ArticleJAMA network open2020
Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- The tumor microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer and a strategy to improve responses to immunotherapy using cryoablation and immunostimulants.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicle-Based Versatile In Situ Nanovaccine Enhancer Synergized With Radiofrequency Ablation Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Fracking in Tumors: A Key Drug Transport Mechanism.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Advances in oncolytic virus delivery strategies and challenges in clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-Integrated Electroporation for Therapeutic Delivery: From Gene Editing to Tumor Ablation and Immune Modulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Outcomes After Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Preclinical Optimization of Magnetotactic Bacteria Therapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic and Rectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Characterization of Anti-Canine PD-1 Antibodies.Cells · 2026Article
- Research progress and clinical translation challenges in the use of oncolytic bacteria for cancer therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Priorities for local immunotherapy research and drug development.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Sialic acid-guided spatiotemporal hydrogel therapy for liver cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Oncolytic viruses: A novel therapeutic approach for pancreatic cancer.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Review
- Chitosan-Glycerol Injectable Hydrogel for Intratumoral Delivery of Macromolecules.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An injectable hydrogel enhances intratumoral retention and antitumor efficacy of cytokine immunotherapy in murine triple negative breast tumor models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025Article
- Review
- LNP-RNA-mediated antigen presentation leverages SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity for cancer treatment.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Phase I study of BMS-986299, an NLRP3 agonist, as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Mapping drug distribution using CT imaging following direct tissue injection in ex vivo liver: informing clinical implementation.CVIR oncology · 2025Article
- Microbubble-Protected Oncolytic Virotherapy Targeted by Sonoporation Induces Tumor Necrosis and T-Lymphocyte Infiltration in Humanized Mice Bearing Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Integrated Imaging Probe and Bispecific Antibody Development Enables In Vivo Targeting of Glypican-3-Expressing Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2024Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Direct intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is a compelling approach to overcoming barriers to systemic immunotherapy efficacy. While the use of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy drugs is increasing rapidly in both the investigational and standard of care domains, the feasibility and safety of these interventions, particularly for deeper lesions that require image-guidance, remain unknown. Objective: To address current knowledge gaps in image-guided techniques for intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and the safety of these interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series study was performed at a single tertiary cancer center over a 2-year period from January 2016 to January 2018. Patients were followed until January 2019. All patients who underwent image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy agents in the standard of care, off-label, or investigational setting during the study period were included. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 1, 2019. Exposures: Image-guided biopsies and intratumoral injections of immunotherapies across several clinical trials as well as standard of care talimogene laherparepvec therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Technical success, defined as the delivery of the prescribed injectate volume in its entirety, for image-guided biopsy and injections and procedure-related adverse events. Results: A total of 85 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [47-71] years; 42 [52%] men) underwent 498 encounters during the study period. These encounters comprised 327 image-guided intratumoral investigational agent injections in 67 patients in clinical trials, including 33 patients with melanoma (50%), 14 patients with sarcoma (21%), 3 patients with ovarian cancer (4.5%), 2 patients with breast cancer (3%), and 2 patients with colon cancer (3%). An additional 18 patients with melanoma underwent 113 image-guided talimogene laherparepvec injections. There were no adverse events reported related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score ≥3), including dyspnea and severe flu-like symptoms developing within 24 hours of the injection and requiring hospitalization, occurred after 3 of 327 investigational agent injections (2%) and 4 of 113 talimogene laherparepvec injections (4%). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this case series study suggest that intratumoral injections of immunotherapies were feasible across a range of histological conditions and target organs. Immediate postdelivery anticipated adverse events occurred in a small number of instances. Performing physicians should have the necessary safeguards in place to respond as needed. Optimal methods for intratumoral drug delivery remain unresolved, and efforts to standardize drug delivery techniques are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.