Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725211›Full record

Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020

Retinal Neurovascular Impairment in Patients with Essential Hypertension: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study.

Qingsheng Peng, Yijun Hu, Manqing Huang, Ying Wu, Pingting Zhong, Xinran Dong, Qiaowei Wu, Baoyi Liu, Cong Li, Jinxian Xie and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. La Tunisie medicale · 2024
    Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qingsheng Peng,.
Yijun Hu,.
Manqing Huang,.
Ying Wu,.
Pingting Zhong,.
Xinran Dong,.
Qiaowei Wu,.
Baoyi Liu,.
Cong Li,.
Jinxian Xie,.
Yu Kuang,.
Danqing Yu,.
Honghua Yu,.
Xiaohong Yang,.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate retinal neurovascular structural changes in patients with essential hypertension. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study consisted of 199 right eyes from 169 nondiabetic essential hypertensive patients, divided into groups as follows: group A, 113 patients with hypertensive retinopathy (HTNR); group B, 56 patients without HTNR; and a control group of 30 healthy subjects. Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), radial peripapillary segmented (RPC), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL), and superficial (SVP) and deep (DVP) vascular plexus density at the macula (6 × 6 mm2) were measured by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Results: DVP density was significantly reduced in groups A and B compared to the control group (group A DVP, P = 0.001; group B DVP P = 0.002). GC-IPL, RNFL thickness, and RPC and SVP density in group A were significantly decreased compared to the control group or group B (all P < 0.05). In hypertensive patients, GC-IPL and RNFL thickness were negatively correlated with severity of HTNR (GC-IPL, r = -0.331, P < 0.001; RNFL, r = -0.583, P < 0.001) and level of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) (GC-IPL, r = -0.160, P = 0.050; RNFL, r = -0.282, P = 0.001) and were positively correlated with SVP (GC-IPL, r = 0.267, P = 0.002; RNFL, r = 0.361, P < 0.001) and RPC density (GC-IPL, r = 0.298, P < 0.001; RNFL, r = 0.663, P < 0.001). Among subjects with grade 2 or 3 retinopathy, the superior RNFL was significantly thinner in patients with high HBPM level than in those with normal HBPM level (grade 2, P = 0.016; grade 3, P = 0.006). Conclusions: Reduction of retinal vessel density and RNFL thickness is observed in patients with HTNR and is inversely associated with level of HBPM.

Indexed as

Essential HypertensionHypertensive RetinopathyRetinal VesselsAngiographyBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicrovesselsMiddle AgedRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID32725211
PMCPMC7425736
OpenAlexW3045772874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.