Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32725057›Full record

SynthesisRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2020

Ideal benznidazole dose regimen in chronic chagasic patients: a systematic review.

Virgínia Paula Frade, Nathália Soares Simões, Nayara Ragi Baldoni Couto, Cristina Sanches, Cláudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Virgínia Paula FradeUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nathália Soares SimõesUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nayara Ragi Baldoni CoutoUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cristina SanchesUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cláudia Di Lorenzo OliveiraUniversidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Federal University of São João del-Rei · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to review the existing literature and to evaluate the best dose regimen for benznidazole in adult patients with Chagas disease in the chronic phase. A systematic review was conducted followed by meta-analysis. Searches were performed in four databases, to include studies published until May 2019. The descriptors used were: "Chagas disease", "benznidazole", "Drug Therapy", "Pharmacokinetics", "Dose-response relationship, drug" and "Chronic disease". The meta-analysis compared studies using the standard dose of 5 mg/kg/day for 30 or 60 days. A total of 608 articles were found, 23 of which were considered eligible for this review and nine were included in the meta-analysis. The studies selected and analyzed were published between 1996 and 2018, with various benznidazole dose regimens, ranging from 2.5 mg/kg/day to 10 mg/kg/day, for 30 to 80 days of treatment. The results pointed to a great diversity of dose regimens, thus there is no consensus on the optimal dose regimen for benznidazole in the chronic phase of Chagas disease.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseNitroimidazolesTrypanosoma cruziAdultChronic DiseaseHumansTrypanocidal AgentsbenzonidazoleNitroimidazolesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID32725057
PMCPMC7384592
OpenAlexW3044329043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.