Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724888›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

Preliminary results of robotic inguinal hernia repair following its introduction in a single-center trial.

Takuya Saito, Yasuyuki Fukami, Tairin Uchino, Shintaro Kurahashi, Tatsuki Matsumura, Takaaki Osawa, Takashi Arikawa, Shunichiro Komatsu, Kenitiro Kaneko, Tsuyoshi Sano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Usefulness of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the Endoscope Manipulator Robot (EMARO).Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takuya SaitoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-9209
Yasuyuki FukamiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-5362
Tairin UchinoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-573X
Shintaro KurahashiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Tatsuki MatsumuraDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Takaaki OsawaDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Takashi ArikawaDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Shunichiro KomatsuDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Kenitiro KanekoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Tsuyoshi SanoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Department of Surgery Aichi Medical University Nagakute Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimRobotic surgery using the da Vinci system has markedly increased worldwide. However, robotic inguinal hernia repair remains unpopular outside the United States. We introduced and evaluated a robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (R-TAPP) technique for inguinal hernia in our hospital.

methodsFirst, we designed a task protocol according to the surgical results of 388 laparoscopic TAPP (L-TAPP) procedures performed during the 4 years prior to introducing R-TAPP. Our task protocol included several time limitations during a step-wise procedure: creating the peritoneal flap (<60 minutes), mesh placement with fixation (<30 minutes), and peritoneal suture closure (<30 minutes) under experienced supervision. We investigated the preliminary clinical results of R-TAPP performed by a single operator between December 2018 and January 2020.

resultsWe identified 27 lesions in 20 patients (unilateral in 13 and bilateral in seven). According to the Japan Hernia Society Classification, our cohort included eight type I, five type II, and seven bilateral hernias (nine type I, four type II, and one type IV). The median operation time was 124 minutes (range, 81-164 minutes), and the median console operation time was 85 minutes (range, 50-132). The median time required for the peritoneal incision was 30 minutes (range, 18-54 minutes), that for mesh placement (including tucking) was 13 minutes (range, 7-27 minutes), and that for peritoneal suturing was 9 minutes (range, 3-20 minutes).

conclusionOur preliminary results suggest that our task protocol for R-TAPP is feasible. However, refinement of our task protocol is essential for standardization.

Indexed as

inguinal hernialaparoscopyrobotic surgical proceduressafety managementtreatment protocols

Identifiers

PMID32724888
PMCPMC7382428
OpenAlexW3033467214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.