Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724874›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

Genetic analysis in the clinical management of biliary tract cancer.

Toshifumi Wakai, Masayuki Nagahashi, Yoshifumi Shimada, Pankaj Prasoon, Jun Sakata

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshifumi WakaiDivision of Digestive and General Surgery Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Niigata Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2443-3428
Masayuki NagahashiDivision of Digestive and General Surgery Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Niigata Japan.
Yoshifumi ShimadaDivision of Digestive and General Surgery Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Niigata Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0524-236X
Pankaj PrasoonDivision of Digestive and General Surgery Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Niigata Japan.
Jun SakataDivision of Digestive and General Surgery Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Niigata Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1773-0133
Niigata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is clinically and pathologically heterogeneous and responds inadequately to treatment. A small section of patients develop resectable disease, although the relapse rates are high; the benefits of adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy for BTC are now understood, and gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy is the first line of therapeutic strategy for BTC; however, alternative therapy for BTC is not known. Genomic profiling can provide detailed information regarding the carcinogenesis, identification, and therapy for BTC. Currently, confirmed restorative targets for BTC are lacking. In this review, we aimed to analyze the preclinical and clinical implications of a spectrum of genomic alterations associated with new potentially remedial targets. We focused on eight draggable genes for BTC, which were described as having evidence of therapeutic impact (evidence level 2A-3B) based on the clinical practice guidance for next-generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment; these include ERBB2, NTRK1, RNF43, CDK6, CDKN2B, FGFR2, IDH1, and IDH2. Moreover, some of the BTC present microsatellite instability, hypermutation, and germline variants, which we also reviewed. Finally, we discussed the therapeutic options based on the next-generation sequencing findings in BTC. Studies have demonstrated that BTC includes subgroups with individually distinct driver mutations, most of which will be targeted with new treatment plans.

Indexed as

biliary tract cancercholangiocarcinomagenetic analysisgenome medicinesurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID32724874
PMCPMC7382432
OpenAlexW3017215320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.