Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724807›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Cervical Cytology of Samples with

Fabiana Pirani Carneiro, Andersen Charles Darós, Adriana Cysneiro Milhomem Darós, Tércia Maria Mendes Lousa de Castro, Marcos de Vasconcelos Carneiro, Cecília Ramos Fidelis, Mariane Vieira Vilioni, Michelle Egídio da Costa Matsunaga, Jéssica Meneses Othon Sidou, Mariana Anaue Lozi Dias Chaves and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Diagnosis ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Epidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabiana Pirani CarneiroPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-4752
Andersen Charles DarósPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Adriana Cysneiro Milhomem DarósPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Tércia Maria Mendes Lousa de CastroPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Marcos de Vasconcelos CarneiroCatholic University of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4151-0114
Cecília Ramos FidelisGynecological Unit, University Hospital of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Mariane Vieira VilioniPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Michelle Egídio da Costa MatsunagaGynecological Unit, University Hospital of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Jéssica Meneses Othon SidouGynecological Unit, University Hospital of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Mariana Anaue Lozi Dias ChavesGynecological Unit, University Hospital of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1541-6757
Lívia Custódio PereiraGynecological Unit, University Hospital of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Ceres Nunes de ResendeGynecological Unit, University Hospital of Brasilia, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Agenor de Castro Moreira Dos SantosMolecular Biology Laboratory-LACEN DF, Brazil.
Vânia Moraes FerreiraPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8532-0542
Andrea Barretto MotoyamaPathology Department of Brasília University, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-2638
Universidade de Brasília · BRHospital Universitário de Brasília · BRUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite increasing application of molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of sexually transmitted infections, the cytological findings in pap smears of patients with pathogens that can be identified only by PCR are not yet well described. The aim of this study was to describe the most common cytological features in cervical pap smears of patients with

methodsCervical samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology and for multiplex PCR were collected from women ranging from 23 to 54 years old, who underwent routine screening at a gynecological Unit.

resultsMultiplex PCR was positive in 36.2% of the samples:

conclusionFailure to identify an inflammatory agent in pap smear with intense neutrophil exudate may suggest the presence of

Indexed as

AdultCervix UteriChlamydia trachomatisFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMycoplasma hominisMycoplasma InfectionsNeisseria gonorrhoeaeTrichomonas vaginalisUreaplasmaUreaplasma urealyticum

Identifiers

PMID32724807
PMCPMC7366191
OpenAlexW3041288854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.