ArticleBioMed research international2020
Ankle-Brachial Index as the Best Predictor of First Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Treated Systemic Hypertension.
Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ankle-Brachial Index as a Predictor of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Hypertension: A Systematic Review.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Correlation Between Cardiac Troponin Serum Concentration and Selected Parameters of Subclinical Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Patients With and Without Arterial Hypertension: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Real-World Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Markers of Vascular Dysfunction in Hypertension.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Arterial Stiffness Assessment by Pulse Wave Velocity in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components: Is It a Useful Tool in Clinical Practice?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Peripheral artery disease, abnormal ankle-brachial index, and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- The high normal ankle brachial index is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension patients among the Han Chinese.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Chronic Lower Extremity Ischemia and Its Association with the Frailty Syndrome in Patients with Diabetes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Ankle-brachial index: more than a diagnostic test?Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of our study was to evaluate the incidence of target organ damages (TOD) in patients with arterial hypertension and the first ever episode of myocardial infarction (N-STEMI or STEMI) and to determine which of the analyzed kinds of TOD had the highest predictive value for the assessment of the likelihood of acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
resultsAge, BMI, blood pressure, and time since diagnosis of hypertension did not differ between the study groups. There were no differences regarding blood lipids and eGFR, while hsCRP was significantly increased in the study group. The left ventricular mass index was similar in both groups. Patients with myocardial infarction had significantly increased IMT and decreased ABI. The statistical analysis revealed that only ABI was the most significant predictor of ACS in the study group.
conclusionAmong several TOD, ABI seems to be the most valuable parameter in the prediction of ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.