ArticleCureus2020
Orthostatic Hypotension and Urine Specific Gravity Among Collegiate Athletes.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The purpose of this study is to describe orthostatic blood pressure (BP) and urine specific gravity (USG) among collegiate athletes and then to examine if correlations between these variables could support use of orthostatic hypotension (OH) measures to screen for dehydration. Methods A prospective observational study was performed using a sample of convenience of collegiate athletes. Athlete's sex and sport were recorded in addition to height, weight, seated and standing BP and USG measured at a pre- and post-season encounter. An OH response was defined as either the systolic BP decreasing ≥ 15 mmHg or the diastolic BP decreasing ≥ 7 mmHg when transitioning from sit to stand. The USG was considered positive for dehydration if >1.020. Descriptive statistics, pairwise t-tests, and the Spearman version of the correlation coefficient were used with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results Eighty athletes met inclusion criteria. Six athletes had an OH response during pre-season and three during post-season. Increased frequencies of athletes testing positive for dehydration were identified during the post-season compared to pre-season measures. No significant association was identified between OH and elevated USG. A secondary analysis identified significant associations between athletes with increased height and OH responses and correlations between higher BP and USG. Conclusion This study identified collegiate athletes with pre- and post-season OH as well as athletes with USG measures meeting the threshold for dehydration. While no correlation between OH and USG was identified, findings suggest screening of both BP and hydration status among collegiate athletes may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.