Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724674›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and treatment2020

Real-World Experience with Dolutegravir-Based Two-Drug Regimens.

Douglas Ward, Moti Ramgopal, David J Riedel, Cindy Garris, Shelly Dhir, John Waller, Jenna Roberts, Katie Mycock, Alan Oglesby, Bonnie Collins and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tenofovir alafenamide plus dolutegravir as a switch strategy in HIV-infected patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Douglas WardDupont Circle Physicians Group, Washington, DC, USA.
Moti RamgopalMidway Immunology and Specialty Care Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA.
David J RiedelInstitute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cindy GarrisViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2685-1204
Shelly DhirViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
John WallerAdelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Jenna RobertsAdelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6959-3025
Katie MycockAdelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Alan OglesbyViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Bonnie CollinsViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Megan DominguezViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
James PikeAdelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.
Joseph MrusViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDolutegravir-based 2-drug regimens (DTG 2DRs) are now accepted as alternatives to 3-drug regimens for HIV antiretroviral treatment (ART); however, literature on physician drivers for prescribing DTG 2DR is sparse. This study evaluated treatment patterns of DTG 2DR components in clinical practice in the US.

methodsThis was a retrospective chart review in adult patients in care in the US with HIV-1 who received DTG 2DR prior to July 31, 2017, with follow-up until January 30, 2018. Primary objectives of the study were to determine reasons for patients initiating DTG 2DR and to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics. All analyses were descriptive.

resultsOverall, 278 patients received DTG 2DR (male: 70%; mean age: 56 years). Most patients were treatment experienced (98%), with a mean 13.5 years of prior ART. DTG was most commonly paired with darunavir (55%) or rilpivirine (27%). The most common physician-reported reasons for initiating DTG 2DR were treatment simplification/streamlining (30%) and avoidance of potential long-term toxicities (20%). Before starting DTG 2DR, 42% of patients were virologically suppressed; of those, 95% maintained suppression while on DTG 2DR. Of the 50% of patients with detectable viral load before DTG 2DR, 79% achieved and maintained virologic suppression on DTG 2DR during follow-up. There were no virologic data for 8% of patients prior to starting DTG 2DR. Only 15 patients discontinued DTG 2DR, of whom 4 (27%) discontinued due to virologic failure.

conclusionsPrior to commercial availability of the single-tablet 2DRs, DTG 2DR components were primarily used in treatment-experienced patients for treatment simplification and avoidance of long-term toxicities. Many of these patients achieved and maintained virologic suppression, with low discontinuation rates.

Identifiers

PMID32724674
PMCPMC7364229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.