Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724525›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Fluid preservation causes minimal reduction of parasite detectability in fish specimens: A new approach for reconstructing parasite communities of the past?

Evan A Fiorenza, Katie L Leslie, Mark E Torchin, Katherine P Maslenikov, Luke Tornabene, Chelsea L Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A reconstruction of parasite burden reveals one century of climate-associated parasite decline.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-term change in the parasite burden of shore crabs (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evan A FiorenzaSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA.
Katie L LeslieSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA.
Mark E TorchinSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama City Republic of Panama.
Katherine P MaslenikovSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA.
Luke TornabeneSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA.
Chelsea L WoodSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2738-3139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term datasets are needed to evaluate temporal patterns in wildlife disease burdens, but historical data on parasite abundance are extremely rare. For more than a century, natural history collections have been accumulating fluid-preserved specimens, which should contain the parasites infecting the host at the time of its preservation. However, before this unique data source can be exploited, we must identify the artifacts that are introduced by the preservation process. Here, we experimentally address whether the preservation process alters the degree to which metazoan parasites are detectable in fluid-preserved fish specimens when using visual parasite detection techniques. We randomly assigned fish of three species (

Indexed as

historical ecologymarine fish parasitesmuseum collectionsnatural historyparasite abundance

Identifiers

PMID32724525
PMCPMC7381554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.