Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724513›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Mortality limits used in wind energy impact assessment underestimate impacts of wind farms on bird populations.

Peter Schippers, Ralph Buij, Alex Schotman, Jana Verboom, Henk van der Jeugd, Eelke Jongejans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A stochastic model for estimating sustainable limits to wildlife mortality in a changing world.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  3. A simple DEB-based ecosystem model.Conservation physiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter SchippersWageningen Environmental Research Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0206-6877
Ralph BuijWageningen Environmental Research Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.
Alex SchotmanWageningen Environmental Research Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.
Jana VerboomWageningen Environmental Research Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-148X
Henk van der JeugdVogeltrekstation - Dutch Centre for Avian Migration and Demography (NIOO-KNAW) Wageningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-9526
Eelke JongejansAnimal Ecology and Physiology Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-7419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consequences of bird mortality caused by collisions with wind turbines are increasingly receiving attention. So-called acceptable mortality limits of populations, that is, those that assume that 1%-5% of additional mortality and the potential biological removal (PBR), provide seemingly clear-cut methods for establishing the reduction in population viability.We examine how the application of these commonly used mortality limits could affect populations of the Common Starling, Black-tailed Godwit

Indexed as

bird mortalitycollisionsOrnis 1% mortality criterionpopulation viabilitypotential biological removalthreshold assessment methodswind farm

Identifiers

PMID32724513
PMCPMC7381563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.