ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2020
Expenditure, Utilization, and Cost of Specialty Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis in the US Medicaid Population, 2008-2018.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: A systematic literature review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and patient experience with at-home infusion of ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Trial
- The intersection of race and sex on the clinical and cognitive progression of multiple sclerosis.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2024Article
- How Do Copayment Coupons Affect Branded Drug Prices and Quantities Purchased?American economic journal. Economic policy · 2024Article
- Assessing treatment switch among patients with multiple sclerosis: A machine learning approach.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Cladribine Tablets for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Clinician's Review.Neurology and therapy · 2022Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Expenditure, Utilization, and Cost of Specialty Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis in the US Medicaid Population, 2008-2018.American health & drug benefits · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a rare, long-standing, and disabling disease that affects the central nervous system and causes several clinical manifestations. As a result, this disease is associated with a high societal economic burden.
objectiveTo analyze the trends in drug expenditure, utilization, and cost of specialty drugs for the treatment of patients with MS in the US Medicaid program.
methodsIn this retrospective drug utilization research analysis, we obtained prescription data and reimbursement of disease-modifying therapies for MS from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data between January 2008 and December 2018. The specialty drugs considered in our analysis included dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, teriflunomide, cladribine, siponimod, alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, daclizumab, glatiramer acetate, peginterferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1a, and interferon beta-1b. The annual trends of the number of prescriptions, reimbursement expenditures, and costs were calculated. The average reimbursement per prescription was calculated as an estimate of the drug cost.
resultsThe annual MS drug utilization increased from 85,209 prescriptions in 2008 to 223,604 in 2016, and then decreased to 194,877 in 2018. The annual reimbursement surged by 633% in the 10-year study period between 2008 and 2018, from almost $172 million in 2008 to more than $1.4 billion in 2017, and then to approximately $1.26 billion in 2018. The cost per prescription increased over time for most MS brand-name drugs (eg, from $2033 in 2008 to $5114 in 2018 for natalizumab, and from $19,138 in 2016 to $23,588 in 2018 for alemtuzumab). In 2008, self-injectable drugs dominated the market. In recent years, a shift has occurred in the utilization and reimbursement of MS drugs, with oral medications becoming predominant.
conclusionThe study findings indicate intermarket and interbrand competition among the MS specialty drugs. The growing utilization and spending trends for specialty MS medications are significant and sizable in the US Medicaid programs. Medicaid cost-containment strategy is warranted to control the economic burden of state budgets across the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32724502PMC7370830What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.