ArticleOncology letters2020
Blood cell parameters as prognostic predictors of disease development for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a diagnostic nomogram integrating anatomical scores and systemic immune-inflammatory biomarkers forFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of peripheral blood leukocyte parameters, NE-WX, LY-Y, MO-WY, MO-Y, MO-Z, and NE-SFL, in lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognosis predictor after curative hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- How General and Inflammatory Status Impacts on the Prognosis of Patients Affected by Lung Cancer: State of the Art.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- A Nomogram Model Based on the Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score (IINS) and Classic Clinical Indicators for Predicting Prognosis in Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Haematologic biomarkers and survival in gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Review
- Article
- Peripheral Blood Cell Ratios as Prognostic Indicators in a Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Breast Cancer Cohort.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- NLR, PLR, LMR and MWR as diagnostic and prognostic markers for laryngeal carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- The Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Platelet-to-Lymphocyte and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Operated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the prognostic value of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte/white blood cell ratio (LWR) has been described in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the association between complete blood cell parameters prior to disease treatment and NSCLC have yet to be identified. The aim of the present study was to assess the complete blood cell parameters prior to disease treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC. A total of 268 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. Clinical and laboratory data of the patients were acquired through medical records. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of the neutrophil/white blood cell ratio (NWR), NLR, platelet/white blood cell ratio (PWR), PLR, monocyte/white blood cell ratio (MWR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and LWR. Kaplan-Meier univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of complete blood parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The optimal cut-off values were identified as 0.67 for NWR, 2.85 for NLR, 37.23 for PWR, 166.56 for PLR, 0.074 for MWR, 0.31 for MLR and 0.24 for LWR. Univariate analysis revealed that sex (P=0.038), histological type (P<0.0001), NWR (P=0.026), NLR (P=0.044) and MLR (P=0.012) were all associated with PFS, whereas histological type (P=0.003), NWR (P=0.003), NLR (P=0.015), MLR (P=0.006) and LWR (P=0.043) were significantly associated with OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Histological type (P=0.002) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Whereas histological type (P=0.005), NWR (P=0.005), NLR (P=0.014), MLR (P=0.006), and LWR (P=0.034) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Taken together, the present study identified high NWR, NLR and MLR, and low LWR as independent prognostic factors for poor OS in patients with NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.