ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020
Comparison of Common Methods for Precision Volume Measurement of Hematoma.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The hematoma measurement accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography angiography in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- The Application Value of Personalized 3D Printed Navigation Molds in Neurosurgery.Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Impact of bladder size and shape on the accuracy of formula method for bladder volume evaluation.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Delirium After Traumatic Brain Injury: Prediction by Location and Size of Brain Lesion.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Accuracy of automated intracerebral hemorrhage volume measurement on non-contrast computed tomography: a Swedish Stroke Register cohort study.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Unified ICH quantification and prognosis prediction in NCCT images using a multi-task interpretable network.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- 3D slicer-based calculation of hematoma irregularity index for predicting hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Computed tomography in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging predictors of hematoma expansion and outcome.Insights into imaging · 2022Review
- Contrast enhancement by location and volume is associated with long-term outcome after thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Association of Haptoglobin Phenotypes with Outcomes in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Rigid Neuroendoscopy Assisted Hematoma Resection Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma With Mixed Density: A Retrospective Analytic Cohort Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Prediction of Hematoma Expansion in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Thromboelastography With Platelet Mapping: A Prospective Observational Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur aim is to conduct analysis and comparison of some methods commonly used to measure the volume of hematoma, for example, slice method, voxelization method, and 3D-Slicer software method (projection method).
methodIn order to validate the accuracy of the slice method, voxelization method, and 3D-Slicer method, these three methods were first applied to measure two known volumetric models, respectively. Then, a total of 198 patients diagnosed with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) were recruited. The patients were split into 3 different groups based on the hematoma size: group 1: volume < 10 ml (
resultsThere was a significant estimation error (
conclusionsThe 3D-Slicer software method is considered as a stable and capable method of high precision for the calculation of a closed hematoma model with correct normal direction, while it would be inappropriate for the nonclosed model nor the model with incorrect normal direction. The slice method and voxelization method can be the supplement and improvement of the 3D-Slicer software method, for the purpose of achieving precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.