Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724200›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2021

Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing for acute leukemia in EBMT transplant centers: a survey on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT.

Arnon Nagler, Frédéric Baron, Myriam Labopin, Emmanuel Polge, Jordi Esteve, Ali Bazarbachi, Eolia Brissot, Gesine Bug, Fabio Ciceri, Sebastian Giebel and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cancers · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 19 institutions in 13 countries.

Arnon Nagler *Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Tel Aviv, Israel. Arnon.Nagler@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-1265
Frédéric Baron *Department of Hematology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-3812
Myriam LabopinEBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-4748
Emmanuel PolgeEBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC, Paris, France.
Jordi EsteveHematology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Ali BazarbachiDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Eolia BrissotDepartment of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Gesine BugMedizinische Klinik II, Hämatologie, Medizinische Onkologie, Goethe-Universitaet, Frankfurt, Germany.
Fabio CiceriOspedale San Raffaele S.r.l., Haematology and BMT, Milan, Italy.
Sebastian GiebelDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Oncohematology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-4401
Maria H GilleeceYorkshire Blood and Marrow Transplant Programme, Haematology Department, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0364-3573
Norbert-Claude GorinDepartment of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Francesco LanzaHematology Unit, Romagna Transplant Network, Ravenna, Italy.
Zinaida PericBone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital Center Rebro, Zagreb, Croatia.
Annalisa RuggeriOspedale San Raffaele S.r.l., Haematology and BMT, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-2765
Jaime SanzHematology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-4619
Bipin N SavaniDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-9965
Christoph SchmidKlinikum Augsburg, II Medizinische Klinik, Augsburg, Germany.
Roni ShouvalAdult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandros SpyridonidisBMT Unit, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-2532
Jurjen VersluisErasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-1663
Mohamad MohtyEBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center · LBAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITErasmus MC · NLEuropean Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · FRGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSorbonne Université · FRSt James's University Hospital · GBTel Aviv University · ILThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Liège · BEVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detectable measurable residual disease (MRD) is a key prognostic factor in both acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Thus, we conducted a survey in EBMT transplant centers focusing on pre- and post-allo-HCT MRD. One hundred and six centers from 29 countries responded. One hundred had a formal strategy for routine MRD assessment, 91 for both ALL and AML. For ALL (n = 95), assessing MRD has been routine practice starting from 2010 (range, 1990-2019). Techniques used for MRD assessment consisted of PCR techniques alone (n = 27), multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC, n = 16), both techniques (n = 43), next-generation sequencing (NGS) + PCR (n = 2), or PCR + MFC + NGS (n = 7). The majority of centers assessed MRD every 2-3 months for 2 (range, 1-until relapse) years. For AML, assessing MRD was routine in 92 centers starting in 2010 (range 1990-2019). Assessment of MRD was by PCR (n = 23), MFC (n = 13), both PCR and MFC (n = 39), both PCR and NGS (n = 3), and by all three techniques (n = 14). The majority assesses MRD for AML every 2-3 months for 2 (range, 1-until relapse) years. This survey is the first step in the aim to include MRD status as a routine registry capture parameter in acute leukemia.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteFlow CytometryHumansNeoplasm, ResidualTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID32724200
OpenAlexW3045586285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.