Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724156›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

A comparison of the effectiveness of azelaic and pyruvic acid peels in the treatment of female adult acne: a randomized controlled trial.

Karolina Chilicka, Aleksandra M Rogowska, Renata Szyguła, Iwona Dzieńdziora-Urbińska, Jakub Taradaj

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Azelaic Acid: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Role of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 in the progression of dyslipidemia in acne vulgaris patients.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Effects of Green Tea (Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karolina ChilickaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Opole, 45-060, Opole, Poland.
Aleksandra M RogowskaInstitute of Psychology, University of Opole, 45-052, Opole, Poland. arogowska@uni.opole.pl.
Renata Szyguła *Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Opole, 45-060, Opole, Poland.
Iwona Dzieńdziora-Urbińska *Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Opole, 45-060, Opole, Poland.
Jakub Taradaj *Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
University of Opole · PLInstitute of Psychology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical peels are widely used as therapeutic agents in dermatology and cosmetology. This study aims to explore the differences in the effectiveness of azelaic and pyruvic acid peels in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Eligibility criteria for participants were: female gender, 18-25 years of age, no dermatological treatment within the last 12 months and mild to moderate papulopustular acne. We treated 120 young women (with a mean age of 22 years old) with six peeling sessions at 2-week intervals. In the parallel clinical study design, one randomized group (n = 60, 50%) was treated using azelaic acid (AA), whereas the second group participated in pyruvic acid (PA) sessions. We evaluated the patients clinically twice (before and after treatment), using the Scale of Hellegren-Vincent Severity Symptoms to assess the acne diagnosis, and the Nati Analyzer to estimate the skin properties (oily skin, desquamation, porosity, and moisture). The clinical evaluation of the patients demonstrated a significant reduction of acne severity symptoms in both the AA and PA groups, after the peeling sessions. An effect was also found in terms of decreasing desquamation and the oiliness of the skin. PA showed a more significant reduction of greasy skin than AA. In conclusion, after the six peeling sessions using AA and PA, all patients showed better skin parameters in term of reduced oiliness and desquamation. Both AA and PA peelings are a safe and efficient treatment for mild acne, however, during the selection of one of the two acids, side effects, skin properties, and patients' preferences should be taken into account. This study was registered in the ISRCTN registry (registration number ISRCTN79716614, 17/01/2020).

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisAdultAnalysis of VarianceDicarboxylic AcidsFemaleHumansPorosityPyruvic AcidSkinTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultazelaic acidDicarboxylic AcidsPyruvic Acid

Identifiers

PMID32724156
PMCPMC7387545
OpenAlexW3045838536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.