Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724115›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Cell spheroid fusion: beyond liquid drops model.

Nastasia V Kosheleva, Yuri M Efremov, Boris S Shavkuta, Irina M Zurina, Deying Zhang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Nikita V Minaev, Anastasiya A Gorkun, Shicheng Wei, Anastasia I Shpichka and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engineering Multi-Spheroid Bone Constructs Through the Fusion of Large MSC Spheroids.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TheMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nastasia V KoshelevaFSBSI "Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology", 8, Baltiyskaya st., Moscow, 125315, Russia. n_kosheleva@mail.ru.
Yuri M EfremovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Boris S ShavkutaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Irina M ZurinaFSBSI "Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology", 8, Baltiyskaya st., Moscow, 125315, Russia.
Deying ZhangDepartment of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyuan ZhangWake Forest University Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Nikita V MinaevInstitute of Photonic Technologies, Research Center "Crystallography and Photonics" RAS, 2, Pionerskaya st., Troitsk, Moscow, 142190, Russia.
Anastasiya A GorkunFSBSI "Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology", 8, Baltiyskaya st., Moscow, 125315, Russia.
Shicheng WeiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Central Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Anastasia I ShpichkaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Irina N SaburinaFSBSI "Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology", 8, Baltiyskaya st., Moscow, 125315, Russia.
Peter S TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological self-assembly is crucial in the processes of development, tissue regeneration, and maturation of bioprinted tissue-engineered constructions. The cell aggregates-spheroids-have become widely used model objects in the study of this phenomenon. Existing approaches describe the fusion of cell aggregates by analogy with the coalescence of liquid droplets and ignore the complex structural properties of spheroids. Here, we analyzed the fusion process in connection with structure and mechanical properties of the spheroids from human somatic cells of different phenotypes: mesenchymal stem cells from the limbal eye stroma and epithelial cells from retinal pigment epithelium. A nanoindentation protocol was applied for the mechanical measurements. We found a discrepancy with the liquid drop fusion model: the fusion was faster for spheroids from epithelial cells with lower apparent surface tension than for mesenchymal spheroids with higher surface tension. This discrepancy might be caused by biophysical processes such as extracellular matrix remodeling in the case of mesenchymal spheroids and different modes of cell migration. The obtained results will contribute to the development of more realistic models for spheroid fusion that would further provide a helpful tool for constructing cell aggregates with required properties both for fundamental studies and tissue reparation.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBiomarkersCell FusionCells, CulturedCell ShapeElastic ModulusEpithelial CellsHumansLimbus CorneaeMesenchymal Stem CellsRetinal Pigment EpitheliumSpheroids, CellularBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32724115
PMCPMC7387529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.