ArticleScientific reports2020
SimpylCellCounter: an automated solution for quantifying cells in brain tissue.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activity of CaMKII-expressing neurons in medial prefrontal cortex of male and female Long-Evans rats is necessary for encoding odor information and novelty recognition in an odor-based incidental memory test.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Impaired vasopressin neuromodulation of the lateral septum leads to social behavior deficits in Shank3BNature communications · 2025Article
- Automated detection of c-Fos-expressing neurons using inhomogeneous background subtraction in fluorescent images.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2025Article
- Thermoregulatory heat-escape/cold-seeking behavior in mice and the influence of TRPV1 channels.PloS one · 2022Article
- SimpylCellCounter: an automated solution for quantifying cells in brain tissue.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Manual quantification of activated cells can provide valuable information about stimuli-induced changes within brain regions; however, this analysis remains time intensive. Therefore, we created SimpylCellCounter (SCC), an automated method to quantify cells that express cFos protein, an index of neuronal activity, in brain tissue and benchmarked it against two widely-used methods: OpenColonyFormingUnit (OCFU) and ImageJ Edge Detection Macro (IMJM). In Experiment 1, manually-obtained cell counts were compared to those detected via OCFU, IMJM and SCC. The absolute error in counts (manual versus automated method) was calculated and error types were categorized as false positives or negatives. In Experiment 2, performance analytics of OCFU, IMJM and SCC were compared. In Experiment 3, SCC analysis was conducted on images it was not trained on, to assess its general utility. We found SCC to be highly accurate and efficient in quantifying cells with circular morphologies that expressed cFos. Additionally, SCC utilized a new approach to count overlapping cells with a pretrained convolutional neural network classifier. The current study demonstrates that SCC is a novel, automated tool to quantify cells in brain tissue and complements current, open-sourced methods designed to detect cells in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.