Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32724052›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Global reward state affects learning and activity in raphe nucleus and anterior insula in monkeys.

Marco K Wittmann, Elsa Fouragnan, Davide Folloni, Miriam C Klein-Flügge, Bolton K H Chau, Mehdi Khamassi, Matthew F S Rushworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell-type-specific sustained value representations in the claustrum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epigenetic manipulation of anterior insular cortex alters neural signals and cognitive control.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fundamental features of social environments determine rate of social affiliation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco K WittmannWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. marco.k.wittmann@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-7457
Elsa FouragnanWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-0332
Davide FolloniWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-5969
Miriam C Klein-FlüggeWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-9833
Bolton K H ChauDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-5176
Mehdi KhamassiSorbonne Université, CNRS, Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, F-75005, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-1046
Matthew F S RushworthWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council CQR01330Medical Research Council MR/P024955/1Medical Research Council MR/T023007/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105238/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT100973AI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People and other animals learn the values of choices by observing the contingencies between them and their outcomes. However, decisions are not guided by choice-linked reward associations alone; macaques also maintain a memory of the general, average reward rate - the global reward state - in an environment. Remarkably, global reward state affects the way that each choice outcome is valued and influences future decisions so that the impact of both choice success and failure is different in rich and poor environments. Successful choices are more likely to be repeated but this is especially the case in rich environments. Unsuccessful choices are more likely to be abandoned but this is especially likely in poor environments. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) revealed two distinct patterns of activity, one in anterior insula and one in the dorsal raphe nucleus, that track global reward state as well as specific outcome events.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCerebral CortexChoice BehaviorImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, AnimalRaphe Nuclei

Identifiers

PMID32724052
PMCPMC7387352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.