Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723831›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2020

Systematic literature review of efficacy/effectiveness and safety of current therapies for the treatment of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, hyperimmunoglobulin D syndrome and tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome.

Jasmin Beate Kuemmerle-Deschner, Raju Gautam, Aneesh Thomas George, Syed Raza, Kathleen Graham Lomax, Peter Hur

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. A rare missense p.C125Y mutation in theFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  12. Dermatologic Manifestations of Noninflammasome-Mediated Autoinflammatory Diseases.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasmin Beate Kuemmerle-DeschnerDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany kuemmerle.deschner@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6365-6598
Raju GautamPatient Access Services, Novartis Healthcare Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Aneesh Thomas GeorgePatient Access Services, Novartis Healthcare Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Syed RazaPatient Access Services, Novartis Healthcare Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Kathleen Graham LomaxMedical Affairs, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Peter HurHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Novartis (India) · INNovartis (United States) · USUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral therapies are used for the treatment of rareautoinflammatory conditions like cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndromes (CAPS), hyperimmunoglobulin Dsyndrome (HIDS)/mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) and tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). However, reviews reporting on treatment outcomes of these therapies are lacking.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE-In Process and Cochrane databases to identify the randomised/non-randomised controlled trials (RCTs/non-RCTs) and real-world observational studies of CAPS, HIDS/MKD and TRAPS published as full-texts (January 2000-September 2017) or conference abstracts (January 2014-September 2017). Studies with data for ≥1 biologic were included. Studies with <5 patients were excluded.

resultsOf the 3 342 retrieved publications, 72 studies were included (CAPS, n=43; HIDS/MKD, n=9; TRAPS, n=7; studies with ≥2 cohorts, n=13). Most studies were full-text (n=56), published after 2010 (n=56) and real-world observational studies (n=58). Among included studies, four were RCTs (canakinumab, n=2 (CAPS, n=1; HIDS/MKD and TRAPS, n=1); rilonacept, n=1 (in CAPS); simvastatin, n=1 (in HIDS/MKD)). Canakinumab and anakinra were the most commonly used therapies for CAPS and HIDS/MKD, whereas etanercept, canakinumab and anakinra were the most common for TRAPS. The available evidence suggested the efficacy or effectiveness of canakinumab and anakinra in CAPS, HIDS/MKD and TRAPS, and of etanercept in TRAPS; asingle RCT demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in CAPS.

conclusionsCanakinumab, anakinra, etanercept and rilonacept were reported to be well tolerated; however, injection-site reactions were observed frequently with anakinra, rilonacept and etanercept. Data on the use of tocilizumab, infliximab and adalimumab in these conditions were limited; thus, further research is warranted.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingCombined Modality TherapyCryopyrin-Associated Periodic SyndromesDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityDrug SubstitutionFeverHereditary Autoinflammatory DiseasesHumansMevalonate Kinase DeficiencyPublication BiasTreatment OutcomeFever SyndromesOutcomes researchTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32723831
PMCPMC7722275
OpenAlexW3045681719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.