Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723785›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2020

Factors affecting patient recruitment to trials: qualitative research in general practice.

Marian J van den Brink, Monique Hummel, Marrit Lemstra, Marjolein Y Berger, Janny H Dekker, Marco H Blanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Huisarts en wetenschap · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marian J van den BrinkDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands M.J.van.den.Brink@umcg.nl.
Monique HummelDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marrit LemstraDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marjolein Y BergerDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janny H DekkerDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marco H BlankerDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-8730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient recruitment to clinical research is often challenging and, when inadequate, can result in delayed or underpowered studies. Recruitment problems were experienced during a study of women with heavy menstrual bleeding in general practice (the MIRA trial). Although efforts were made to reduce the burden of the study for those participating, patient recruitment was still an issue.

aimTo identify the barriers and facilitators associated with patient recruitment to clinical trials, as experienced by GPs. DESIGN &

settingA qualitative study was performed in Dutch general practice, using semi-structured interviews.

methodGPs participating in the MIRA trial were selected by purposive sampling and interviewed until saturation was reached. Three independent researchers performed data coding and thematic analysis. Consensus on the identified themes was reached by discussion among the researchers.

resultsSixteen GPs were interviewed. The following factors were noted to influence recruitment: the incidence of the disease under study; awareness of the study; attitude towards scientific research; perceived burden for the patient; usual care by the GP; time investment; characteristics of the GP and their practice; and patient experience of research participation.

conclusionThe identified barriers and facilitators associated with patient recruitment highlight the areas in which future studies can be improved. Indeed, benefits could be gained by simply ensuring that study procedures are clear, by requiring limited (time) investment from the GP, and by investing in personal communication and reminders to keep the GP motivated and interested. Placing greater importance on scientific research during the GP training programme could also serve as a means to motivate future GPs to integrate scientific research in their clinical practice.

Indexed as

general practiceprimary health carequalitative researchrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32723785
PMCPMC7465591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.