Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723776›Full record

ArticleGenetics2020

The Impact of Dominance on Adaptation in Changing Environments.

Archana Devi, Kavita Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Archana DeviTheoretical Sciences Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064 archanadevi@jncasr.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-7316
Kavita JainTheoretical Sciences Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-4109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural environments are seldom static and therefore it is important to ask how a population adapts in a changing environment. We consider a finite, diploid population evolving in a periodically changing environment and study how the fixation probability of a rare mutant depends on its dominance coefficient and the rate of environmental change. We find that, in slowly changing environments, the effect of dominance is the same as in the static environment, that is, if a mutant is beneficial (deleterious) when it appears, it is more (less) likely to fix if it is dominant. But, in fast changing environments, the effect of dominance can be different from that in the static environment and is determined by the mutant's fitness at the time of appearance as well as that in the time-averaged environment. We find that, in a rapidly varying environment that is neutral on average, an initially beneficial (deleterious) mutant that arises while selection is decreasing (increasing) has a fixation probability lower (higher) than that for a neutral mutant as a result of which the recessive (dominant) mutant is favored. If the environment is beneficial (deleterious) on average but the mutant is deleterious (beneficial) when it appears in the population, the dominant (recessive) mutant is favored in a fast changing environment. We also find that, when recurrent mutations occur, dominance does not have a strong influence on evolutionary dynamics.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalEnvironmentGenes, DominantModels, GeneticDiploidyEvolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessSelection, Geneticchanging environmentdominancefixation

Identifiers

PMID32723776
PMCPMC7463278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.