Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723743›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Shared concern with current breast cancer rehabilitation services: a focus group study of survivors' and professionals' experiences and preferences for rehabilitation care delivery.

Bolette Skjødt Rafn, Julie Midtgaard, Pat G Camp, Kristin L Campbell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial experiences of breast cancer survivors: a meta-review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring patients and caregivers needs and experiences in oncological physiotherapy: a call for collaborative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bolette Skjødt RafnDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-3100
Julie MidtgaardThe University Hospitals' Centre for Health Research (UCSF), Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-2127
Pat G CampCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9152-8251
Kristin L CampbellDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada kristin.campbell@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-1382
St. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBreast cancer survivors experience a wide spectrum of physical sequelae from cancer treatment. National and international guidelines recommend that rehabilitation is offered from the point of diagnosis. However, there is a lack of data on the translation of these recommendations into clinical care. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of breast cancer survivors, rehabilitation professionals and breast surgeons on current rehabilitation services including preferences for care delivery, specific ways to promote early detection and timely management of upper body issues and attitudes towards self-managed surveillance and rehabilitation.

designQualitative focus groups. Breast cancer survivors completed a questionnaire about rehabilitation services received and experience of upper body issues. These quantitative data were collected to provide context for the qualitative data and increase transferability. Transcripts were analysed using content analysis.

settingFive geographically distinct health authorities in British Columbia, Canada.

participantsEleven focus groups were conducted with 35 breast cancer survivors, 29 rehabilitation professionals and 5 breast surgeons.

resultsThree categories captured participants' concern and wish for improved care: (1)

conclusionsThe results revealed a gap between oncology guidelines and the current clinical reality. The rehabilitation services were reported in need of revamping to increase equity of care. Multiple upper body issues were reported by many breast cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Rehabilitation CentersAdultBreast NeoplasmsBritish ColumbiaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPostoperative PeriodRehabilitation ResearchSurvivorsbreast tumoursqualitative researchquality in health carerehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID32723743
PMCPMC7389511
OpenAlexW3045748820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.