ArticleBMJ open2020
Detection of risk for depression among adolescents in diverse global settings: protocol for the IDEA qualitative study in Brazil, Nepal, Nigeria and the UK.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Charting neuroethics discourse in Africa: A scoping review of ethical issues of neuroscience research in Africa.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- An Image Schematic Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors of Adolescents' Lived Experiences of Depression.Alpha psychiatry · 2025Article
- No prediction without prevention: A global qualitative study of attitudes toward using a prediction tool for risk of developing depression during adolescence.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators to identifying depression in adolescents: A cross-cultural qualitative study in Brazil, Nepal, and Nigeria.PLOS mental health · 2024Article
- Detection of risk for future depression among adolescents: Stakeholder views of acceptability and feasibility in the United Kingdom.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Adolescent perspectives on depression as a disease of loneliness: a qualitative study with youth and other stakeholders in urban Nepal.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2022Article
- Social isolation as a core feature of adolescent depression: a qualitative study in Porto Alegre, Brazil.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
- Understanding Youth's Lived Experience of Anxiety through Metaphors: A Qualitative, Arts-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Aggression and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury among Depressed Youths: The Mediating Effect of Resilience.Iranian journal of public health · 2021Article
- Identifying risk factors and detection strategies for adolescent depression in diverse global settings: A Delphi consensus study.Journal of affective disorders · 2021Article
- The Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Risk Stratified Cohort (IDEA-RiSCo): Rationale, Methods, and Baseline Characteristics.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGlobally, depression is a leading cause of disability among adolescents, and suicide rates are increasing among youth. Treatment alone is insufficient to address the issue. Early identification and prevention efforts are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. The Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence (IDEA) consortium is developing risk detection strategies that incorporate biological, psychological and social factors that can be evaluated in diverse global populations. In addition to epidemiological and neuroscience research, the IDEA consortium is conducting a qualitative study to explore three domains of inquiry: (1) cultural heterogeneity of biopsychosocial risk factors and lived experience of adolescent depression in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC); (2) the feasibility, acceptability and ethics of a risk calculator tool for adolescent depression that can be used in LMIC and high-income countries and (3) capacity for biological research into biomarkers for depression risk among adolescents in LMIC. This is a multisite qualitative study being conducted in Brazil, Nepal, Nigeria and the UK. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic set of qualitative methods will be used in this study. The Delphi method, Theory of Change (ToC) workshops, key-informant interviews and focus group discussions will be used to elicit perspectives on the study topics from a broad range of stakeholders (adolescents, parents, policy-makers, teachers, health service providers, social workers and experts). Delphi panellists will participate in three survey rounds to generate consensus through facilitated feedback. Stakeholders will create ToC models via facilitated workshops in the LMIC sites. The framework approach will be used to analyse data from the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approvals were received from the Ethics Review Board of George Washington University and from site-specific institutions in Brazil, Nepal, Nigeria and the UK. The findings generated from this study will be reported in highly accessed, peer-reviewed, scientific and health policy journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.