Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723718›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Haptic Nudges Increase Affected Upper Limb Movement During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multiple-Period Randomized Crossover Study.

Nada Elizabeth June Signal, Ruth McLaren, Usman Rashid, Alain Vandal, Marcus King, Faisal Almesfer, Jeanette Henderson, Denise Taylor

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nada Elizabeth June SignalHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9595-0532
Ruth McLarenHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-6944
Usman RashidHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-5493
Alain VandalDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-2953
Marcus KingCallaghan Innovation, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-3311
Faisal AlmesferExsurgo Rehabilitation, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5924-0135
Jeanette HendersonAssessment, Treatment and Rehabilitation Department, Waitakere Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-6685
Denise TaylorHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-5702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs many as 80% of stroke survivors experience upper limb (UL) disability. The strong relationships between disability, lost productivity, and ongoing health care costs mean reducing disability after stroke is critical at both individual and society levels. Unfortunately, the amount of UL-focused rehabilitation received by people with stroke is extremely low. Activity monitoring and promotion using wearable devices offer a potential technology-based solution to address this gap. Commonly, wearable devices are used to deliver a haptic nudge to the wearer with the aim of promoting a particular behavior. However, little is known about the effectiveness of haptic nudging in promoting behaviors in patient populations.

objectiveThis study aimed to estimate the effect of haptic nudging delivered via a wrist-worn wearable device on UL movement in people with UL disability following stroke undertaking inpatient rehabilitation.

methodsA multiple-period randomized crossover design was used to measure the association of UL movement with the occurrence of haptic nudge reminders to move the affected UL in 20 people with stroke undertaking inpatient rehabilitation. UL movement was observed and classified using movement taxonomy across 72 one-minute observation periods from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on a single weekday. On 36 occasions, a haptic nudge to move the affected UL was provided just before the observation period. On the other 36 occasions, no haptic nudge was given. The timing of the haptic nudge was randomized across the observation period for each participant. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed logistic regression. The effect of a haptic nudge was evaluated from the intention-to-treat dataset as the ratio of the odds of affected UL movement during the observation period following a "Planned Nudge" to the odds of affected limb movement during the observation period following "No Nudge."

resultsThe primary intention-to-treat analysis showed the odds ratio (OR) of affected UL movement following a haptic nudge was 1.44 (95% CI 1.28-1.63, P<.001). The secondary analysis revealed an increased odds of affected UL movement following a Planned Nudge was predominantly due to increased odds of spontaneous affected UL movement (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.65-2.51, P<.001) rather than affected UL movement in conjunction with unaffected UL movement (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29, P=.07).

conclusionsHaptic nudging delivered via a wrist-worn wearable device increases affected UL movement in people with UL disability following stroke undertaking inpatient rehabilitation. The promoted movement appears to be specific to the instructions given.

trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12616000654459; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370687&isReview=true.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsStroke RehabilitationWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedStrokeUpper Extremitydisabilityhapticmovementnudgephysical activityrehabilitationstroketechnologyupper limbwearable

Identifiers

PMID32723718
PMCPMC7424469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.