Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32723576›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical rheumatology2020

Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care.

Robyn Speerin, Christopher Needs, Jason Chua, Linda J Woodhouse, Margareta Nordin, Rhona McGlasson, Andrew M Briggs

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Redesigning the Care of Musculoskeletal Conditions With Lifestyle Medicine.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Robyn SpeerinThe Sydney University, Level 7, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, ST LEONARDS, NSW, 2065, Australia. Electronic address: r.speerin@bigpond.com.
Christopher NeedsDepartment of Rheumatology, Level 4, QEII Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, 59 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. Electronic address: chris.neeeds@health.nsw.gov.au.
Jason ChuaCentre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. Electronic address: jason.chua@postgrad.otago.ac.nz.
Linda J WoodhouseSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. Electronic address: linda.woodhouse@curtin.edu.au.
Margareta NordinDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: dmn2@nyu.edu.
Rhona McGlassonBone & Joint Canada, P.O. Box 1036, Toronto, ON, M5K 1P2, Canada. Electronic address: rhonaamcglasson@gmail.com.
Andrew M BriggsSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia. Electronic address: A.Briggs@curtin.edu.au.
Curtin University · AUBone and Joint Canada · CAOrthopedic Center · USRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of Care (MoCs), and their local Models of Service Delivery, for people with musculoskeletal conditions are becoming an acceptable way of supporting effective implementation of value-based care. MoCs can support the quadruple aim of value-based care through providing people with musculoskeletal disease improved access to health services, better health outcomes and satisfactory experience of their healthcare; ensure the health professionals involved are experiencing satisfaction in delivering such care and health system resources are better utilised. Implementation of MoCs is relevant at the levels of clinical practice (micro), service delivery organisations (meso) and health system (macro) levels. The development, implementation and evaluation of MoCs has evolved over the last decade to more purposively engage people with lived experience of their condition, to operationalise the Chronic Care Model and to employ innovative solutions. This paper explores how MoCs have evolved and are supporting the delivery of value-based care in health systems.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareMusculoskeletal DiseasesHumansEvaluationHealth system strengtheningImplementationModels of careMusculoskeletalPatient-centredValue-based care

Identifiers

PMID32723576
PMCPMC7382572
OpenAlexW3044829855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.